Szebenyi v. Canada

Szebenyi v. Canada

Under Rule 343(2) only documents necessary to dispose of the appeal are to be included; orders addressing the representation issue were relevant and must be included in the appeal book, while the Immigration and Refugee Board decision addressing a different issue is not relevant and is to be excluded.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2003 FCA 81
Parties
Applicant: Istvan Szebenyi Jr.; Applicant: Gizella Szebenyi; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
14 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal (immigration/procedural) / Motion Pursuant to Rule 369 to Determine Content of Appeal Book
Outcome
Appeal book ordered to include specified prior orders and correspondence; Immigration and Refugee Board decision TAO-12942 excluded; order issued accordingly.
Legal Topics
Appeal Book Composition, Document Relevance, Representation, Costs
Source Language
en
Immigration Civil Procedure Administrative Law Appeal Book Composition Document Relevance Representation Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Istvan Szebenyi Jr.

Applicant

Gizella Szebenyi

Applicant

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal (immigration/procedural) / Motion Pursuant to Rule 369 to Determine Content of Appeal Book

  1. 1 Whether specific prior orders and correspondence are required to dispose of the appeal under Rule 343(2)
  2. 2 Whether the Immigration and Refugee Board decision (TAO-12942) is relevant to the narrow issue on appeal
  3. 3 Whether letters and bill of costs relating to earlier cost awards should be included for potential costs determination

Ratio Decidendi

Under Rule 343(2) only documents necessary to dispose of the appeal are to be included; orders addressing the representation issue were relevant and must be included in the appeal book, while the Immigration and Refugee Board decision addressing a different issue is not relevant and is to be excluded.

Court Disposition

Appeal book ordered to include specified prior orders and correspondence; Immigration and Refugee Board decision TAO-12942 excluded; order issued accordingly.

Orders

  • Include Order of Gibson J. dated June 3, 1998 (IMM-939-98)
  • Include Order of Prothonotary Lafrenière dated August 18, 2000