Szebenyi v. Canada
Under Rule 343(2) only documents necessary to dispose of the appeal are to be included; orders addressing the representation issue were relevant and must be included in the appeal book, while the Immigration and Refugee Board decision addressing a different issue is not relevant and is to be excluded.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2003 FCA 81
- Parties
- Applicant: Istvan Szebenyi Jr.; Applicant: Gizella Szebenyi; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal (immigration/procedural) / Motion Pursuant to Rule 369 to Determine Content of Appeal Book
- Outcome
- Appeal book ordered to include specified prior orders and correspondence; Immigration and Refugee Board decision TAO-12942 excluded; order issued accordingly.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Book Composition, Document Relevance, Representation, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Istvan Szebenyi Jr.
Applicant
Gizella Szebenyi
Applicant
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal to Federal Court of Appeal (immigration/procedural) / Motion Pursuant to Rule 369 to Determine Content of Appeal Book
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether specific prior orders and correspondence are required to dispose of the appeal under Rule 343(2)
- 2 Whether the Immigration and Refugee Board decision (TAO-12942) is relevant to the narrow issue on appeal
- 3 Whether letters and bill of costs relating to earlier cost awards should be included for potential costs determination
Ratio Decidendi
Under Rule 343(2) only documents necessary to dispose of the appeal are to be included; orders addressing the representation issue were relevant and must be included in the appeal book, while the Immigration and Refugee Board decision addressing a different issue is not relevant and is to be excluded.
Court Disposition
Appeal book ordered to include specified prior orders and correspondence; Immigration and Refugee Board decision TAO-12942 excluded; order issued accordingly.
Orders
- Include Order of Gibson J. dated June 3, 1998 (IMM-939-98)
- Include Order of Prothonotary Lafrenière dated August 18, 2000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Szebenyi v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-02-14 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 81 File numbers A-564-02 Decision Content Date: 20030214 Docket: A-564-02 Neutral citation: 2003 FCA 81 PRESENT: NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: ISTVAN SZEBENYI JR. GIZELLA SZEBENYI Applicants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on February 14, 2003. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A. Date: 20030214 Docket: A-564-02 Neutral citation: 2003 FCA 81 PRESENT: NOËL J.A. BETWEEN: ISTVAN SZEBENYI JR. GIZELLA SZEBENYI Applicants and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR ORDER NOËL J.A. [1] This is a motion brought pursuant to Rule 369 of the Federal Court Rules, 1998 for this Court to determine the content of the appeal book. [2] The parties have failed to reach an agreement on whether to include the following documents: a) Order of Gibson J. dated June 3, 1998 (IMM-939-98); b) Order of Prothonotary Lafrenière, dated August 18, 2000; c) Order of Blais J., dated September 19, 2000 (IMM-739-98); d) Order of Blais J., dated November 2, 2000 (IMM-739-98); e) Order of Blais J., dated December 8, 2000 (IMM-739-98); f) Order of Linden J.A., Sharlow J.A., Malone J.A., dated September 20, 2001 (A-787-00); g) Judgement and Order of The Honourable Madame L'Heureux-Dubé, The Honourable Mr. Justice Bastarache and The Honourable Mr. Justice Binnie dated May 23, 2002 (SCC-28902); h) Order of Prothonotary Lafrenière, dated July 24, 2002; i) Order of Beaudry J., dated August 19, 2002; j) Order of Martineau, J. dated September 27, 2002; k) Order of Beaudry J., dated October 2, 2002; l) Decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board (Appeal division), dated November 28, 2001 (TAO-12942); m) letter dated August 8, 2002; n) letter dated August 19, 2002 and bill of costs for $1,013.85; o) letter dated September 11, 2002. [3] Rule 343(2) of the Federal Court Rules, 1998 sets out that only documents which are required to dispose of an appeal ought to be included in an appeal book. [4] The issue to be determined on this appeal is whether Beaudry J. erred in his refusal to reconsider (in his Order of October 2, 2002) his original refusal (in his Order of August 19, 2002) to overturn Prothonotary Lafrenière's denial to allow the applicant Istvan Szebenyi Jr. to represent his mother. [5] The decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board - referred to above at paragraph 2 l) - dealt with an entirely different issue, namely the applicant's appeal of a denial of sponsorship. As such, it is not relevant to the disposition of the narrow issue raised on this appeal and ought not be included in the appeal book. [6] On the other hand, the orders - referred to above in paragraph 2a)-k) - are relevant inasmuch as they all dealt with the issue of whether the applicant should be allowed to represent his mother. Therefore, all of these orders ought to be included in the appeal book. Similarly, the letters pertaining to the respondent's attempts to obtain payment of costs awarded in other proceedings - referred to above in paragraph 2 m), n) and o) - may be relevant to an order as to costs if the respondent is successful in resisting the appeal. [7] The appeal book will therefore comprise the following documents: a) Order of Gibson J. dated June 3, 1998 (IMM-939-98); b) Order of Prothonotary Lafrenière, dated August 18, 2000; c) Order of Blais J., dated September 19, 2000 (IMM-739-98); d) Order of Blais J., dated November 2, 2000 (IMM-739-98); e) Order of Blais J., dated December 8, 2000 (IMM-739-98); f) Order of Linden J.A., Sharlow J.A., Malone J.A., dated September 20, 2001 (A-787-00); g) Judgement and Order of The Honourable Madame L'Heureux-Dubé, The Honourable Mr. Justice Bastarache and The Honourable Mr. Justice Binnie dated May 23, 2002 (SCC-28902); h) Order of Prothonotary Lafrenière, dated July 24, 2002; i) Order of Beaudry J., dated August 19, 2002; j) Order of Martineau, J. dated September 27, 2002; k) Order of Beaudry J., dated October 2, 2002; l) letter dated August 8, 2002; m) letter dated August 19, 2002 and bill of costs for $1,013.85; n) letter dated September 11, 2002. [8] Excluded therefrom is the decision of the Immigration and Refugee Board (Appeal division), dated November 28, 2001 (TAO-12942). [9] An order is issued accordingly. "Marc Noël" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET:A-564-02 STYLE OF CAUSE:Istvan Szebenyi Jr. et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER BY: NOËL J.A. DATED:February 14, 2003 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Istvan Szebenyi Jr.APPLICANTS Gizella Szebenyi Marcel LaroucheFOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Istvan Szebenyi Jr.APPLICANTS Gizella Szebenyi Oshawa, Ontario Morris RosenbergFOR THE RESPONDENT Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario