ITMO Myra Falls Mine Ltd.
- Citation
- 2025 BCSC 958
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Decision
- 3 April 2025
- Posture
- Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (ccaa) Proceedings / Application for Stay Extension, Approval of Second SISP and Stalking Horse Agreement, and Increase in Interim Financing
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Decision
- 3 April 2025
- Posture
- Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (ccaa) Proceedings / Application for Stay Extension, Approval of Second SISP and Stalking Horse Agreement, and Increase in Interim Financing
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court concluded the proposed second SISP and stalking horse agreement represent a reasonable path to conclude the proceedings, the Monitor supports the process and is positioned to address related‑party concerns, and the requested stay extension and $8 million increase in interim financing are necessary to preserve the asset and allow completion of the sales process; accordingly the requested relief is granted.
Court disposition
Application granted in full
Orders
- Stay of proceedings extended to July 31, 2025
- Interim financing increased by $8,000,000 to an aggregate of $45,000,000
- Approval of the stalking horse agreement with Trafigura Holding SARL as presented to the court
- Authorization to proceed with a second Sales and Investment Solicitation Process (SISP) on the terms described
- Authorization to re‑engage FTI Capital Advisors Canada ULC to assist with the SISP
- Approval in principle of a reverse vesting order mechanism as contemplated by the stalking horse agreement to effect the sale and transfer certain liabilities to a Residual Co.
02
Material facts
Parties
Myra Falls Mine Ltd.
Petitioner Counsel: J.B. Ross; M. Dominguez; V. GauthierFTI Consulting Canada Inc.
Monitor Counsel: P.L. RubinWSP Canada Inc. and WSP E&I Canada Ltd.
Interested Party Contractor Counsel: S.A. TurnerThyssen Mining Construction of Canada Ltd.
Interested Party Contractor Counsel: J.D. SchultzUNIFOR Local 3019
Union/interested Party Counsel: R. AhluwaliaMinistry of Attorney General of British Columbia
Government Interested Party Counsel: C.M. CheukTexcan (a division of Sonepar Canada Inc.)
Interested Party Supplier Counsel: B.J. LorimerHeidelberg Materials Ltd.
Interested Party SupplierFrontline Equipment Ltd.
Interested Party SupplierTrafigura Holding SARL
Stalking Horse Purchaser / Related Party / Interim Financier AffiliateResidual Co.
Residual Company Under Anticipated Reverse Vesting OrderAmounts and remedies
- Interim Financing Increase Requested: CAD 8,000,000
- Aggregate Interim Financing Facility After Increase: CAD 45,000,000
- Expense Reimbursement Under Stalking Horse Agreement: CAD 500,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (ccaa) Proceedings / Application for Stay Extension, Approval of Second SISP and Stalking Horse Agreement, and Increase in Interim Financing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether to extend the stay of proceedings under the CCAA to July 31, 2025
- 02
Whether to approve an $8 million increase in interim financing to aggregate $45 million
- 03
Whether to approve a second SISP and related stalking horse agreement involving a related party
- 04
Whether the proposed reverse vesting order and transfer of unsecured employee claims to Residual Co. is appropriate
- 05
Whether the sales process is sufficiently fair given the related‑party relationship between the stalking horse and the debtor
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Myra Falls sought a stay extension to continue care and maintenance and to complete a revived SISP, approval of a stalking horse bid from Trafigura Holding SARL to provide a backstop, authorization to re‑engage FTI Capital Advisors, and an $8 million increase in interim financing (to a $45 million aggregate) to fund operations while the sales process proceeds. The Monitor supports the relief and the stalking horse agreement provides a market backstop.
- Respondent
- Other stakeholders including lien claimants, the Union and the BC Attorney General took no position on the application but reserved rights to object to any eventual sale; lien claimants and others expressed concerns about the fairness of a related‑party stalking horse transaction and preservation of employee rights and claims under an RVO.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36 and related CCAA jurisprudence
Court may extend stays and approve restructuring steps under the CCAA where necessary to preserve value and the Monitor supports the proposed measures
- 02
CCAA jurisprudence and practice in court‑supervised sales
Approval of a stalking horse agreement and sales process requires judicial satisfaction that the process is reasonable, that the Monitor has been engaged and will address conflicts, and that the bid provides a legitimate market backstop
- 03
CCAA practice and insolvency law principles
Reverse vesting orders may transfer liabilities to a Residual Co. but require attention to employee claims, priority, and statutory protections
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court concluded the proposed second SISP and stalking horse agreement represent a reasonable path to conclude the proceedings, the Monitor supports the process and is positioned to address related‑party concerns, and the requested stay extension and $8 million increase in interim financing are necessary to preserve the asset and allow completion of the sales process; accordingly the requested relief is granted.
Obiter and limits
- The expense reimbursement of $500,000 was noted as low relative to the purchase price and no break fee was sought
- The Monitor is expressly responsible for vigilance regarding the related‑party nature of the stalking horse and potential fairness issues
- The Union and the BC Attorney General reserved rights to object to any eventual sale, particularly on employee and public interest grounds
Court disposition
Application granted in full
- Stay of proceedings extended to July 31, 2025
- Interim financing increased by $8,000,000 to an aggregate of $45,000,000
- Approval of the stalking horse agreement with Trafigura Holding SARL as presented to the court
- Authorization to proceed with a second Sales and Investment Solicitation Process (SISP) on the terms described
- Authorization to re‑engage FTI Capital Advisors Canada ULC to assist with the SISP
- Approval in principle of a reverse vesting order mechanism as contemplated by the stalking horse agreement to effect the sale and transfer certain liabilities to a Residual Co.
Source and reliance status
Supreme Court of British Columbia · 3 April 2025
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Judgment· 3 April 2025
2025 BCSC 958 Myra Falls Mine Ltd. (Re)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Myra Falls Mine Ltd. (Re), 2025 BCSC 958 Date: 20250403 Docket: S238572 Registry: Vancouver In the Matter of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36 as Amended And In the Matter of a Plan of Compromise and Arrangement of Myra Falls Mine Ltd. Petitioner Corrected Judgment: The text of the judgment was corrected on the cover page on May 29, 2025. Before: The Honourable Madam Justice Fitzpatrick Oral Reasons for Judgment In Chambers Counsel for the Petitioner, Myra Falls Mine Ltd.: J.B. Ross M. Dominguez V. Gauthier (by videoconference) Counsel for the Monitor, FTI Consulting Canada Inc.: P.L. Rubin Counsel for WSP Canada Inc. and WSP E&I Canada Ltd.: S.A. Turner Counsel for Thyssen Mining Construction of Canada Ltd.: J.D. Schultz Counsel for UNIFOR Local 3019: R. Ahluwalia Counsel for the Ministry of Attorney General of British Columbia: C.M. Cheuk (by videoconference) Counsel for Texcan, a division of Sonepar Canada Inc., Heidelberg Materials Ltd., and Frontline Equipment Ltd.: B.J. Lorimer (by videoconference) Place and Date of Hearing: Vancouver, B.C. April 3, 2025 Place and Date of Judgment: Vancouver, B.C. April 3, 2025 [1] THE COURT: These are Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA") proceedings that I have been supervising since the proceeding began in late 2023. The subject mine (the asset held
by the petitioner, Myra Falls Mine Ltd. ("Myra Falls") on Vancouver Island), has been in care and maintenance for some time. At this stage, Myra Falls is seeking to move toward what it believes and hopes will result in a conclusion to these proceedings, that have been outstanding for some time. [2] The present application, brought by Myra Falls, is to extend the stay of proceedings to July 31, 2025, to allow ongoing care and maintenance operations at the mine. For that reason, Myra Falls also seeks an $8 million increase in the interim financing, to bring the aggregate to $45 million. [3] The stay extension sought is in addition to other relief that Myra Falls seeks to hopefully move towards some resolution of the proceeding. Myra Falls seeks approval of a second sales and investment solicitation process ("SISP"). In relation to the SISP, Myra Falls has negotiated a stalking horse bid from Trafigura Holding SARL, which is a related party to the Trafigura company that is the indirect owner of Myra Falls and also related in some fashion to the interim financier. [4] The second SISP is modeled essentially on the terms of the original SISP. The order sought also allows for Myra Falls to re-engage FTI Capital Advisors Canada ULC, who was involved in the original SISP. [5] The stalking horse agreement is before me. Myra Falls' counsel describes that there are minimum considerations
in order to be a qualified or compliant bid under the Phase 1 stage. Otherwise, the SISP and the stalking horse agreement are on terms that are consistent with previous sales processes and stalking horse bids that have been presented here. [6] The stalking horse agreement also contemplates that the closing would be through the mechanism of a reverse vesting order ("RVO"). RVOs involve the transfer of certain excluded liabilities and excluded assets to Residual Co. The stalking horse agreement anticipates the purchaser taking over the mine on a care-and-maintenance, and not operational, mode. The purchase price is essentially the interim financing amount, amounts due under certain CCAA charges and what is called a priority payment amount. The conditions include termination of employees, amendments to the impact benefits agreements with the local First Nations and also a wharf lease with respect to the Discovery Terminal. [7] The collective bargaining agreement, presently in place with UNIFOR Local 3019 (the "Union"), is not an excluded contract. However, under the RVO transaction anticipated under the stalking horse agreement, unsecured employee claims, which includes severance, would be transferred to Residual Co. [8] The expense reimbursement amount under the stalking horse agreement is $500,000. In light of the purchase price under the stalking horse agreement, that is a very
low percentage of the purchase price and well below the normal range of usual expense reimbursement amounts. No break fee is sought. [9] The other parties attending on this application, including various lien claimants, take no position on the application. Notwithstanding, the lien claimants' counsel have identified certain concerns with respect to the sales process in light of the close relationship between the Trafigura companies and Myra Falls. I accept the comments of the Monitor's counsel that the Monitor is very much aware of those concerns and, given the Monitor's substantial involvement in the SISP, will be alive to those concerns and prepared to address them, if necessary. [10] The Union's counsel has also made submissions. Its counsel takes no position but reserves rights to object to any sale that might ultimately be proposed for approval with respect to issues relating to the Union and its members. Finally, the BC Attorney General appears and similarly takes no position while reserving the right to make submissions with respect to any proposed sale. [11] The Monitor fully supports the relief sought, as discussed in its Seventh Report dated April 1, 2025. As stated above, the Monitor is very much alive to the expressed concerns of the stakeholders here and is prepared to address those concerns, if necessary, in respect of the sales process. [12] With respect to the
SISP and the stalking horse agreement, I am satisfied that it stands as a reasonable path forward in terms of hopefully bringing this matter to some conclusion. [13] I am also satisfied that it is appropriate to approve the stalking horse agreement for the purpose of providing a backstop to the stakeholders in the event that a further and better bid is not obtained through the open‑market process. [14] I also conclude that the stay extension and the interim financing increase is appropriate as sought. Clearly, it will be some time to complete the revived sales process. The Trafigura company, who has funded the interim financing in these CCAA proceedings, continues to show its support by providing the increase of the facility by $8 million. I accept that Myra Falls is acting in food faith and with due diligence. [15] Accordingly, the orders sought are granted, including the approval of the stalking horse agreement, the increase in the interim financing, and finally, the extension of the stay. "Fitzpatrick J."
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.