Lacey v. Canada
Because the appellant expressly agreed her appeal would suffer the same fate as her husband's appeal, the Court dismissed her appeal and awarded disbursements to the respondent.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2005 FCA 288
- Parties
- Appellant: Jacqueline Lacey; Respondent: Her Majesty The Queen
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; respondent entitled to disbursements.
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal, Disbursements
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacqueline Lacey
Appellant
Her Majesty The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's appeal should be dismissed on the basis that she agreed it would suffer the same fate as her husband's appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Because the appellant expressly agreed her appeal would suffer the same fate as her husband's appeal, the Court dismissed her appeal and awarded disbursements to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; respondent entitled to disbursements.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Respondent entitled to her disbursements.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Lacey v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-09-13 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 288 File numbers A-460-04 Decision Content Date: 20050913 Docket: A-460-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 288 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JACQUELINE LACEY Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Montréal, Quebec on September 13, 2005. Judgment delivered at Montréal, Quebec, on September 13, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: NOËL J.A. Date: 20050913 Docket: A-460-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 288 CORAM: DESJARDINS J.A. NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JACQUELINE LACEY Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Montréal, Quebec, on September 13, 2005) NOËL J.A. [1] The appellant having agreed that her appeal would suffer the same fate as that of her husband (Rajchgot v. Her Majesty The Queen, A-461-04, September 13, 2005), the appeal is dismissed. The respondent will be entitled to Her disbursements. AMarc Noël@ J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-460-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: JACQUELINE LACEY Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec DATE OF HEARING: September 13, 2005 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: DESJARDINS, NOËL, PELLETIER JJ.A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NOËL J.A. APPEARANCES: Nicolas X. Cloutier FOR THE APPELLANT Alain Gareau FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg Montréal, Quebec FOR THE APPELLANT John H. Sims, Q.C Deputy Attorney General of Canada Montréal, Quebec FOR THE RESPONDENT