R. v. Levesque

R. v. Levesque

Assuming without deciding that the standard of review is unaffected by a joint submission, the court found no error in principle and that the period of parole ineligibility was not clearly unreasonable, and therefore dismissed the appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2012 ONCA 231
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Jacqueline Levesque
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
13 April 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / On Appeal From the Sentence Imposed (superior Court of Justice, June 9, 2009)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Parole Ineligibility, Joint Submission, Standard of Review
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Parole Ineligibility Joint Submission Standard of Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Jacqueline Levesque

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / On Appeal From the Sentence Imposed (superior Court of Justice, June 9, 2009)

  1. 1 Whether the standard of review is affected by a joint submission on sentence
  2. 2 Whether the period of parole ineligibility imposed was an error in principle
  3. 3 Whether the period of parole ineligibility was clearly unreasonable

Ratio Decidendi

Assuming without deciding that the standard of review is unaffected by a joint submission, the court found no error in principle and that the period of parole ineligibility was not clearly unreasonable, and therefore dismissed the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Sentence upheld