Robinson v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
The appeal was dismissed as moot and the Minister's motion under Rule 369 was granted because the facts and legal position were not materially different from Jones v. Canada (2006 FCA 279), which supported dismissal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2006 FCA 280
- Parties
- Appellant: Jacqueline Robinson; Respondent: The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration Appeal / Motion Decision Under Rule 369 to Dismiss as Moot
- Outcome
- Motion granted; appeal dismissed as moot.
- Legal Topics
- Mootness, Federal Courts Rules Rule 369, Dismissal of Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacqueline Robinson
Appellant
The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Motion Decision Under Rule 369 to Dismiss as Moot
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal is moot
- 2 Whether the motion under Rule 369 to dismiss the appeal should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed as moot and the Minister's motion under Rule 369 was granted because the facts and legal position were not materially different from Jones v. Canada (2006 FCA 279), which supported dismissal.
Court Disposition
Motion granted; appeal dismissed as moot.
Orders
- Motion under Rule 369 granted; Jacqueline Robinson's appeal dismissed as moot.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Robinson v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2006-08-17 Neutral citation 2006 FCA 280 File numbers A-201-06 Decision Content Date: 20060817 Docket: A-201-06 Citation: 2006 FCA 280 Present: RICHARD C.J. EVANS J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JACQUELINE ROBINSON Appellant (Responding Party) and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondents (Moving Party) Dealt with in writing without appearance of parties. Order delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on August 17, 2006. REASONS FOR ORDER BY: EVANS J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: RICHARD C.J. PELLETIER J.A. Date: 20060817 Docket: A-201-06 Citation: 2006 FCA 280 Present: RICHARD C.J. EVANS J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: JACQUELINE ROBINSON Appellant (Responding Party) and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondents (Moving Party) REASONS FOR ORDER EVANS J.A. [1] The facts of this case are not materially different from those in Jones v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FCA 279, a copy of which is appended to these reasons. [2] For the reasons that I gave in Jones, I would grant the motion brought under Rule 369 of the Federal Courts Rules by the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration to dismiss the Jacqueline Robinson’s appeal as moot. “John M. Evans” J.A. “I agree. J. Richard C.J.” “I agree. J.D.Denis Pelletier J.A.” FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-201-06 STYLE OF CAUSE: Jacqueline Robinson v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration MOTION DEALT WITH IN WRITING WITHOUT APPEARANCE OF PARTIES REASONS FOR ORDER BY: Evans J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: Richard C.J. Pelletier J.A. DATED: August 17, 2006 WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Benjamin A. Kranc FOR THE APPELLANT John Provart FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Kranc & Associates Toronto, Ontario FOR THE APPELLANTS John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT