Oderkirk v. Crittenden

Oderkirk v. Crittenden

The claim failed because although claimants relied on the PCDS, they did not prove the defendants knew or ought to have known the statement was false; evidence indicated the system was functioning for the defendants and likely failed due to age after sale, so no actionable misrepresentation was established and the claim is dismissed.

Citation
2011 NSSM 65
Parties
Claimant: Donald Oderkirk; Claimant: Heather Atkins; Defendant: James Crittenden; Defendant: Margaret Crittenden
Court
Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
12 October 2011
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court / Decision Rendered
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Property Condition Disclosure Statement, Misrepresentation, Non Disclosure, Septic System, Buyer Beware, Negligence, Fraud
Source Language
English
Real Property Contract Tort Consumer Protection Property Condition Disclosure Statement Misrepresentation Non Disclosure Septic System +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Donald Oderkirk

Claimant

Heather Atkins

Claimant

James Crittenden

Defendant

Margaret Crittenden

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Small Claims Court / Decision Rendered

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants misrepresented the condition of the septic system on the Property Condition Disclosure Statement
  2. 2 Whether the defendants knew or ought to have known that the PCDS statement was false (fraud or negligence)
  3. 3 Whether the claimants relied on the PCDS and suffered recoverable damage

Ratio Decidendi

The claim failed because although claimants relied on the PCDS, they did not prove the defendants knew or ought to have known the statement was false; evidence indicated the system was functioning for the defendants and likely failed due to age after sale, so no actionable misrepresentation was established and the claim is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claim dismissed