R. v. Grant
Application dismissed because the applicant failed to establish the appeal is not frivolous on the record provided, failed to demonstrate he would surrender into custody given prior failure to attend and lack of a concrete release plan, and the public interest (enforceability risk given serious cocaine importation...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2021 ONCA 519
- Parties
- Appellant: James Jahkyn Grant; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Bail Pending Appeal (release Pending Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Release Pending Appeal, Section 11(b) Unreasonable Delay, Jury Charge Adequacy, Charter Applications, Surrender Risk, Public Interest Balancing
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Jahkyn Grant
Appellant
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Bail Pending Appeal (release Pending Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed grounds of appeal are not frivolous
- 2 Whether the trial judge inadequately charged the jury on the knowledge element
- 3 Whether the trial judge improperly answered a jury question during deliberations
Ratio Decidendi
Application dismissed because the applicant failed to establish the appeal is not frivolous on the record provided, failed to demonstrate he would surrender into custody given prior failure to attend and lack of a concrete release plan, and the public interest (enforceability risk given serious cocaine importation conviction) weighs against release; court nevertheless directed expedition of the appeal timetable if perfected by a deadline.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for release pending appeal dismissed
- If the applicant perfects his appeal by August 31, 2021 the hearing of the appeal shall occur no later than December 17, 2021 with 2.5 hours of oral argument allocated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
0 paragraphs
Full judgment text is not available for this record.