Weber v. The Queen

Weber v. The Queen

The motions were without merit because the appellant failed to demonstrate any error in the judgment under appeal; accordingly the appeal and motions were dismissed and costs were awarded.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2001 FCA 300
Parties
Appellant: James Lorne Weber; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as Represented by the Minister of National Revenue
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
11 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal — Motions Dismissed
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs; motions dismissed.
Legal Topics
Tax Assessment, Seizure of Property, Motions, Costs, Administrative Enforcement
Source Language
en
Income Tax Act Canada Pension Plan Employment Insurance Act Unemployment Insurance Act Civil Enforcement Act Tax Law Administrative Law Enforcement +5 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Lorne Weber

Appellant

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada as Represented by the Minister of National Revenue

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal — Motions Dismissed

  1. 1 Whether the appellant demonstrated error in the judgment under appeal
  2. 2 Validity and enforceability of the Minister's assessments under the Income Tax Act and related statutes
  3. 3 Lawfulness of the seizure made on August 6, 1999 and entitlement to costs

Ratio Decidendi

The motions were without merit because the appellant failed to demonstrate any error in the judgment under appeal; accordingly the appeal and motions were dismissed and costs were awarded.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs; motions dismissed.

Orders

  • Motions dismissed with costs
  • Appeal dismissed with costs