R. v. Regan

R. v. Regan

Because the appellant sought an adjournment after prior endorsements and communications and then declined to make any submissions, the court properly denied the adjournment and dismissed the appeal and all related motions.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2020 ONCA 567
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: James Regan
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
10 September 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Convictions and Sentence; Consideration of Adjournment Request and S.684 Motion
Outcome
Appeal and all related motions dismissed; adjournment denied
Legal Topics
Adjournment, Self Represented Litigant, Appeal Dismissal, Section 684 Motion
Source Language
en
Criminal Appellate Procedure Adjournment Self Represented Litigant Appeal Dismissal Section 684 Motion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

James Regan

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Convictions and Sentence; Consideration of Adjournment Request and S.684 Motion

  1. 1 Whether to grant adjournment for appellant to retain counsel
  2. 2 Whether appeal should be dismissed when appellant declines to make submissions
  3. 3 Disposition of related s.684 motion

Ratio Decidendi

Because the appellant sought an adjournment after prior endorsements and communications and then declined to make any submissions, the court properly denied the adjournment and dismissed the appeal and all related motions.

Court Disposition

Appeal and all related motions dismissed; adjournment denied

Orders

  • Adjournment denied
  • Appeal dismissed