Robertson (Re)

Robertson (Re)

The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to meet the high burden to demonstrate a reasonable apprehension of bias by the Board Chair when the hearing is viewed as a whole, and because there is no treatment impasse as the appellant has legitimate treatment options at Waypoint which he has refused by not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2015 ONCA 417
Parties
Appellant: James Robertson; Respondent: Person in Charge of Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
12 June 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Under Part Xx.1 of the Criminal Code (ontario Review Board Matter) / Appeal to Court of Appeal From Ontario Review Board Disposition Dated January 22, 2014; Hearing May 27, 2015
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Reasonable Apprehension of Bias, Treatment Impasse, Conditions of Disposition, Ontario Review Board Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Mental Health Law Administrative Law Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Treatment Impasse Conditions of Disposition Ontario Review Board Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Robertson

Appellant

Person in Charge of Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Under Part Xx.1 of the Criminal Code (ontario Review Board Matter) / Appeal to Court of Appeal From Ontario Review Board Disposition Dated January 22, 2014; Hearing May 27, 2015

  1. 1 Whether the Board Chair's conduct created a reasonable apprehension of bias
  2. 2 Whether there is a treatment impasse requiring the Board to order conditions of disposition to break the impasse

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to meet the high burden to demonstrate a reasonable apprehension of bias by the Board Chair when the hearing is viewed as a whole, and because there is no treatment impasse as the appellant has legitimate treatment options at Waypoint which he has refused by not engaging with the treatment team.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.