Wajaras v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

Wajaras v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

The Minister does not engage in an abuse of process by seeking a removal order to strip a permanent resident of status for serious criminality even where there are impediments to removal; therefore the certified abuse‑of‑process question is answered in the negative and the appeal is dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2010 FCA 41
Parties
Appellant: James Wajaras; Respondent: The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
10 February 2010
Procedural Posture
Immigration — Removal/deportation / Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal From Federal Court Judgments (2009 FC 200 and 2009 FC 252)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Deportation, Inadmissibility Under Section 45, Serious Criminality, Removal Orders
Source Language
en
Immigration Law Administrative Law Criminal Law Abuse of Process Deportation Inadmissibility Under Section 45 Serious Criminality Removal Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Wajaras

Appellant

The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Immigration — Removal/deportation / Appeal to the Federal Court of Appeal From Federal Court Judgments (2009 FC 200 and 2009 FC 252)

  1. 1 Whether the Minister engages in an abuse of process by continuing to seek a removal order where the individual has been determined not to be a danger to the public
  2. 2 Whether the Immigration Division can decline to make an inadmissibility determination under section 45 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act on that basis

Ratio Decidendi

The Minister does not engage in an abuse of process by seeking a removal order to strip a permanent resident of status for serious criminality even where there are impediments to removal; therefore the certified abuse‑of‑process question is answered in the negative and the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • No costs awarded