Smith v. Royal & SunAlliance Insurance Company of Canada

Smith v. Royal & SunAlliance Insurance Company of Canada

Leave to appeal was denied because the appellant failed to raise an arguable issue warranting the Court's review; the respondent was awarded costs of $1,500 plus reasonable disbursements.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2008 NSCA 121
Parties
Appellant: Janice Mary Anne Smith; Respondent: Royal & SunAlliance Insurance Company of Canada
Court
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 December 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal Application
Outcome
Leave to appeal denied
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Costs, Arguable Issue
Source Language
en
Insurance Civil Procedure Appeal Leave to Appeal Costs Arguable Issue

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Janice Mary Anne Smith

Appellant

Royal & SunAlliance Insurance Company of Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Leave to Appeal Application

  1. 1 Whether the appellant raised an arguable issue warranting leave to appeal
  2. 2 Whether costs should be awarded to the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was denied because the appellant failed to raise an arguable issue warranting the Court's review; the respondent was awarded costs of $1,500 plus reasonable disbursements.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal denied

Orders

  • Leave to appeal denied
  • Respondent awarded costs of $1,500 plus reasonable disbursements to be agreed upon or taxed