L.E.S. v. J.C.S.
Because the child is enrolled in an approved post-secondary program with respondent's agreement and remains dependent, she remains a 'child' for support; respondent's Guideline income ($184,332) governs table child support for periods the child resides with claimant, s.7 educational and related expenses are necessary and reasonable and must be shared proportionately, claimant demonstrated prima facie entitlement to interim spousal support and need and respondent ability to pay justify mid-range SSAG support with no income imputed to claimant, and claimant as economically disadvantaged spouse is entitled to an interim distribution from trust funds under s.89 FLA; respondent's request for...
- Citation
- 2021 BCSC 1733
- Parties
- Claimant: L.E.S.; Respondent: J.C.S.
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law (support and Property) / Interim Applications (chambers); Pre Trial Interim Relief
- Outcome
- Claimant's applications granted in part and respondent's application for interim distribution dismissed; claimant awarded specified interim child support, interim spousal support, contribution to s.7 expenses, interim distribution from trust funds, and costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Distribution, S.7 Special Expenses, Family Violence, Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines, Federal Child Support Guidelines, Imputation of Income, Disclosure, S.89 FLA
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L.E.S.
Claimant
J.C.S.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law (support and Property) / Interim Applications (chambers); Pre Trial Interim Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether child support should continue for an 18/19 year old attending post-secondary studies and the amount and timing of interim child support
- 2 Whether interim spousal support should be ordered, its amount, retroactivity and imputation of income
- 3 Whether s.7 special (post-secondary) expenses should be shared and the respondent's proportionate share
Ratio Decidendi
Because the child is enrolled in an approved post-secondary program with respondent's agreement and remains dependent, she remains a 'child' for support; respondent's Guideline income ($184,332) governs table child support for periods the child resides with claimant, s.7 educational and related expenses are necessary and reasonable and must be shared proportionately, claimant demonstrated prima facie entitlement to interim spousal support and need and respondent ability to pay justify mid-range SSAG support with no income imputed to claimant, and claimant as economically disadvantaged spouse is entitled to an interim distribution from trust funds under s.89 FLA; respondent's request for...
Court Disposition
Claimant's applications granted in part and respondent's application for interim distribution dismissed; claimant awarded specified interim child support, interim spousal support, contribution to s.7 expenses, interim distribution from trust funds, and costs in the cause.
Orders
- Respondent to pay child support in the table amount of $1,624 per month for the four-month university break in 2021; arrears for 2021 of $6,496 payable forthwith
- If trial has not proceeded respondent to pay child support of $1,624 per month commencing May 1, 2022 for the four-month university break in 2022
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment