Richer v. Freeland

Richer v. Freeland

The Court found no error of fact or law in Mr. Justice Strayer's decision and therefore refused to interfere, dismissing the appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2007 FCA 326
Parties
Appellant: Jean Richer; Respondent: Maria Lynn Freeland, Independent Chairperson, Saskatchewan Penitentiary; Respondent: Attorney General of Canada
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
10 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Decision on Appeal Dismissal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Standard of Review, Judicial Review Appeal, Costs
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Judicial Review Federal Court Procedure Standard of Review Judicial Review Appeal Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jean Richer

Appellant

Maria Lynn Freeland, Independent Chairperson, Saskatchewan Penitentiary

Respondent

Attorney General of Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal / Decision on Appeal Dismissal

  1. 1 Whether the decision of Mr. Justice Strayer contained errors of law or fact warranting appellate interference

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found no error of fact or law in Mr. Justice Strayer's decision and therefore refused to interfere, dismissing the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs