Massé v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)

Massé v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)

The application was dismissed because the facts and issues were indistinguishable from Stewart v. Canada, and that precedent required dismissal of the judicial review application.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2002 FCA 86
Parties
Plaintiff: Jean-Roch Massé; Defendant: Minister of National Revenue
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 February 2002
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Federal Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed without costs.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review of Tax Assessment, Precedent and Stare Decisis
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Tax Law Judicial Review Judicial Review of Tax Assessment Precedent and Stare Decisis

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jean-Roch Massé

Plaintiff

Minister of National Revenue

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Judicial Review / Federal Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's case is distinguishable from Stewart v. Canada
  2. 2 Whether the application for judicial review should be dismissed under binding precedent

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the facts and issues were indistinguishable from Stewart v. Canada, and that precedent required dismissal of the judicial review application.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed without costs.

Orders

  • Application for judicial review dismissed without costs.