Lepage v. Canada (Attorney General)

Lepage v. Canada (Attorney General)

Because the board of referees failed to consider important evidence showing the claimant lost employment due to a stoppage directly attributable to a labour dispute, the umpire properly intervened to correct the board's errors and the application for judicial review is dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2004 FCA 17
Parties
Applicant: Jeffrey Lepage; Respondent: The Attorney General of Canada
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
15 January 2004
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal (federal Court of Appeal)
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Board of Referees, Umpire Intervention, Labour Dispute Stoppage, Entitlement to Benefits
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Labour Law Employment Insurance Law Judicial Review Board of Referees Umpire Intervention Labour Dispute Stoppage Entitlement to Benefits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jeffrey Lepage

Applicant

The Attorney General of Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Appeal (federal Court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the board of referees failed to consider material evidence
  2. 2 Whether the umpire properly intervened to correct the board's errors
  3. 3 Whether the claimant lost employment due to a stoppage directly attributable to a labour dispute affecting entitlement to benefits

Ratio Decidendi

Because the board of referees failed to consider important evidence showing the claimant lost employment due to a stoppage directly attributable to a labour dispute, the umpire properly intervened to correct the board's errors and the application for judicial review is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Application for judicial review dismissed with costs.
  • Reasons to be filed in cases A-94-03, A-182-03, A-183-03, A-185-03 and A-186-03 in support of dismissals; respondent entitled to disbursements in those cases.