R. v. Madore

R. v. Madore

The Court allowed the sentence appeal to the extent of applying a 1.5:1 credit for presentence custody, varying the sentence to 68 months less 24 months credit, and dismissed the appeal as to conviction as abandoned.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2015 ONCA 20
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Joey Armand Madore
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 January 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Sentence
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part (sentence varied); appeal as to conviction dismissed as abandoned.
Legal Topics
Presentence Custody Credit, Appeal Abandonment, Sentence Variation
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Presentence Custody Credit Appeal Abandonment Sentence Variation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Joey Armand Madore

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Sentence

  1. 1 Whether presentence custody credit should be calculated on a 1.5:1 basis
  2. 2 Whether the sentence should be varied accordingly
  3. 3 Status of the appeal as to conviction given appellant's notice of abandonment

Ratio Decidendi

The Court allowed the sentence appeal to the extent of applying a 1.5:1 credit for presentence custody, varying the sentence to 68 months less 24 months credit, and dismissed the appeal as to conviction as abandoned.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part (sentence varied); appeal as to conviction dismissed as abandoned.

Orders

  • Sentence varied to 68 months less 24 months credit for presentence custody (1.5:1 credit applied)
  • Appeal as to conviction dismissed as abandoned per notice filed December 9, 2014