Sutherland v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

Sutherland v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

The appeal is dismissed for mootness and, under Rule 22 of the Federal Court Immigration Rules, no costs are awarded because no special reasons exist.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2002 FCA 426
Parties
Appellant: John Alan Sutherland; Respondent: The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
4 November 2002
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal Under S.83 of the Immigration Act / Federal Court of Appeal Judgment; Reasons Delivered From the Bench
Outcome
Appeal dismissed for mootness; no costs awarded.
Legal Topics
Mootness, Costs, Federal Court Immigration Rules Rule 22, Section 83 Immigration Act
Source Language
en
Immigration Law Administrative Law Procedural Law Mootness Costs Federal Court Immigration Rules Rule 22 Section 83 Immigration Act

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Alan Sutherland

Appellant

The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Immigration Appeal Under S.83 of the Immigration Act / Federal Court of Appeal Judgment; Reasons Delivered From the Bench

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is moot
  2. 2 Whether costs may be awarded under Rule 22 of the Federal Court Immigration Rules in the absence of special reasons

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed for mootness and, under Rule 22 of the Federal Court Immigration Rules, no costs are awarded because no special reasons exist.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed for mootness; no costs awarded.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • No costs awarded