Christoforou v. John Grant Haulage Ltd.
Having found discrimination, the Tribunal awarded lost wages only from the date of suspension (May 10, 2010) through a reasonable recovery period ending March 31, 2011 because the complainant did not mitigate his losses thereafter and the causal link to the respondent’s conduct ended; reinstatement was denied because the complainant testified he intended to retire by end of 2015; the Tribunal awarded specific monetary remedies (lost wages, RRSP contributions for the linked period, RRSP early‑withdrawal adjustment limited to the linked period, pension and tax gross‑up adjustments, limited medical expenses), $18,000 for pain and suffering and $15,000 for reckless conduct, set an interest...
- Citation
- 2021 CHRT 15
- Parties
- Complainant: Michael Christoforou; Commission: Canadian Human Rights Commission; Respondent: John Grant Haulage Ltd.
- Court
- Canadian Human Rights Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Human Rights Employment Complaint / Remedies Decision Following Liability Finding
- Outcome
- Respondent found to have discriminated on disability grounds; Tribunal awarded limited lost wages, benefits and other remedies; reinstatement denied; respondent ordered to revise policies and provide training
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Age Discrimination, Accommodation, Remedies, Lost Wages, Reinstatement, Mitigation, Pain and Suffering, Special Damages, Public Interest Remedy
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Christoforou
Complainant
Canadian Human Rights Commission
Commission
John Grant Haulage Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Human Rights Employment Complaint / Remedies Decision Following Liability Finding
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a causal link exists between the respondent’s discriminatory conduct and claimed lost wages
- 2 Appropriate cut-off date for lost wages and scope of reasonable recovery period
- 3 Whether complainant reasonably mitigated his losses
Ratio Decidendi
Having found discrimination, the Tribunal awarded lost wages only from the date of suspension (May 10, 2010) through a reasonable recovery period ending March 31, 2011 because the complainant did not mitigate his losses thereafter and the causal link to the respondent’s conduct ended; reinstatement was denied because the complainant testified he intended to retire by end of 2015; the Tribunal awarded specific monetary remedies (lost wages, RRSP contributions for the linked period, RRSP early‑withdrawal adjustment limited to the linked period, pension and tax gross‑up adjustments, limited medical expenses), $18,000 for pain and suffering and $15,000 for reckless conduct, set an interest...
Court Disposition
Respondent found to have discriminated on disability grounds; Tribunal awarded limited lost wages, benefits and other remedies; reinstatement denied; respondent ordered to revise policies and provide training
Orders
- Pay $46,813.76 in compensation for lost wages and vacation pay (May 10, 2010 to March 31, 2011), subject to statutory deductions
- Pay $3,906 in RRSP entitlements for the linked period
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment