Shaw v. Shaw
On the balance of probabilities the wife proved entitlement to relief: the husband dissipated assets and failed to provide medical evidence to rebut imputation, so income of $26,000 was imputed to him; pensions accrued during marriage are divisible equally; given the parties' means and the wife's disability and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2009 NSSC 353
- Parties
- Petitioner: Sherryl Dale Shaw; Respondent: John Gregory Shaw
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce (family Division) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Divorce granted and relief awarded to petitioner as detailed in orders
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof (civil), Imputation of Income, Dissipation of Assets, Equal Division of Pensions, Periodic Spousal Support, Lump Sum Spousal Support, Life Insurance Beneficiary Designation, Continuation of Health Benefits, Credit and Bankruptcy Consequences
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sherryl Dale Shaw
Petitioner
John Gregory Shaw
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce (family Division) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the burden of proof?
- 2 How should matrimonial assets and debts be divided (including pensions)?
- 3 Should income be imputed to the respondent?
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the wife proved entitlement to relief: the husband dissipated assets and failed to provide medical evidence to rebut imputation, so income of $26,000 was imputed to him; pensions accrued during marriage are divisible equally; given the parties' means and the wife's disability and need, the husband must pay periodic spousal support of $650/month in addition to half the gross military pension and a lump sum of $1,610.60 for immediate medical/dental needs; the husband must provide life and health insurance coverage or reimburse according to specified percentages.
Court Disposition
Divorce granted and relief awarded to petitioner as detailed in orders
Orders
- Divorce granted based on one year separation.
- Equal division of the respondent's pensions (Department of National Defence and School Board) from date of plan entry to date of separation, including increases by indexation or interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment