Calder v. Calder
No retroactive child support (table or section 7) prior to January 1, 2011 because respondent's voluntary payments to end of 2010 exceeded the table amount and respondent paid or exceeded his share of special expenses; no retroactive spousal support because payments made satisfied any retroactive need given applicant's part‑time work, delays and conduct, respondent's ability to pay and debt; ongoing child support for 2011 set at $791/month based on respondent income $93,590 with annual adjustment procedures; parties must each name the other as beneficiary of 50% of life insurance held at separation while child remains dependent or spousal support is payable; right to apply for spousal...
- Citation
- 2011 NSSC 328
- Parties
- Petitioner: Jane Sadie Calder; Respondent: John Hugh Calder
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce / Family Law (corollary Relief) / Trial Judgment (written Decision)
- Outcome
- Divorce granted; no retroactive child or spousal support; ongoing child support ordered with adjustments; spousal support not ordered retroactively and right to apply reserved for two years; life insurance beneficiary order regarding 50% shares; costs reserved for later hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Retroactive Child Support, Section 7 Expenses, Retroactive Spousal Support, Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines, Security for Support (life Insurance), Income Determination, Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jane Sadie Calder
Petitioner
John Hugh Calder
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce / Family Law (corollary Relief) / Trial Judgment (written Decision)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether retroactive child support (table and section 7) is owing for period Nov 2008–Dec 2010
- 2 Calculation and adjustment of ongoing child support for 2011 and subsequent years
- 3 Whether retroactive spousal support is owed for Nov 2008–Oct 2010
Ratio Decidendi
No retroactive child support (table or section 7) prior to January 1, 2011 because respondent's voluntary payments to end of 2010 exceeded the table amount and respondent paid or exceeded his share of special expenses; no retroactive spousal support because payments made satisfied any retroactive need given applicant's part‑time work, delays and conduct, respondent's ability to pay and debt; ongoing child support for 2011 set at $791/month based on respondent income $93,590 with annual adjustment procedures; parties must each name the other as beneficiary of 50% of life insurance held at separation while child remains dependent or spousal support is payable; right to apply for spousal...
Court Disposition
Divorce granted; no retroactive child or spousal support; ongoing child support ordered with adjustments; spousal support not ordered retroactively and right to apply reserved for two years; life insurance beneficiary order regarding 50% shares; costs reserved for later hearing.
Orders
- Divorce granted.
- There shall be no retroactive (pre January 1, 2011) order for child support (table or section 7).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment