Smith v. Surrette
On the balance of probabilities the Defendant's vehicle struck the Claimant's house at foundation level (supported by vehicle damage, debris, airbag deployment, a prior admission and improbability of stopping inches before the structure), that impact caused or opened a foundation crack permitting cold air to freeze and burst a pipe, and those resulting water damages were a reasonably foreseeable type of damage; award claimant maximum Small Claims Court damages of $25,000 plus specified disbursements.
- Citation
- 2017 NSSM 61
- Parties
- Claimant: Dianne Smith; Defendant: John Jacob Surrette
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court Property Damage (tort) / Decision (reasons for Decision, Judgment on Liability and Damages)
- Outcome
- Judgment for Claimant; damages awarded at the Small Claims Court maximum and disbursements allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Causation, Foreseeability, Credibility Assessment, Damages Assessment, Expert Evidence, Occupancy/insurance Status
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dianne Smith
Claimant
John Jacob Surrette
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court Property Damage (tort) / Decision (reasons for Decision, Judgment on Liability and Damages)
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the Defendant's vehicle make contact with the Claimant's house?
- 2 Did the collision cause or materially contribute to a foundation crack that led to frozen pipe and consequent water damage?
- 3 Were the damages legally foreseeable?
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities the Defendant's vehicle struck the Claimant's house at foundation level (supported by vehicle damage, debris, airbag deployment, a prior admission and improbability of stopping inches before the structure), that impact caused or opened a foundation crack permitting cold air to freeze and burst a pipe, and those resulting water damages were a reasonably foreseeable type of damage; award claimant maximum Small Claims Court damages of $25,000 plus specified disbursements.
Court Disposition
Judgment for Claimant; damages awarded at the Small Claims Court maximum and disbursements allowed.
Orders
- Award $25,000.00 to Claimant Dianne Smith for property damage and related losses
- Award disbursements to Claimant: $199.35 (issuance fee), $159.33 (service fee), $724.50 (expert witness fees for Philip Barkhouse)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment