J.T.K.S. v. D.L.S.
The child's relocation to Calgary constituted a material change; the court lacked jurisdiction to change custody on an access variation application and therefore declined to grant temporary custody to the father; however, in the child's best interests the access order was varied to remove alternate weekend access...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2002 BCSC 1563
- Parties
- Plaintiff: J.T.K.S.; Defendant: D.L.S.
- Court
- Supreme Court of British Columbia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 7 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Variation of Access Under the Divorce Act / Application to Vary Access Order (hearing)
- Outcome
- Access order varied as set out; custody order unchanged; each party to bear their own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Access, Material Change of Circumstances, Best Interests of the Child, Jurisdiction to Vary Custody, Parens Patriae
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J.T.K.S.
Plaintiff
D.L.S.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Family Law Variation of Access Under the Divorce Act / Application to Vary Access Order (hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the move to Calgary constituted a material change in the child's circumstances
- 2 Whether varying the access order is in the child's best interests
- 3 Whether the court could change custody on an application to vary access (temporary custody)
Ratio Decidendi
The child's relocation to Calgary constituted a material change; the court lacked jurisdiction to change custody on an access variation application and therefore declined to grant temporary custody to the father; however, in the child's best interests the access order was varied to remove alternate weekend access and implement a revised schedule and facilitative provisions to maximize reasonable contact given the relocation.
Court Disposition
Access order varied as set out; custody order unchanged; each party to bear their own costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment