R. v. Riles
The Undertaking to an Officer in Charge was not proven to be a court or public document, the Crown failed to authenticate it or invoke an applicable hearsay exception, and therefore the Court cannot take judicial notice of it; the Undertaking is not admitted into evidence.
- Citation
- 2020 NSPC 2
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Accused: Antonio Ronald Riles
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal (charge Under Criminal Code S.145(5.1)) / Trial — Evidentiary Admissibility Decision
- Outcome
- Crown's request denied; Undertaking not admitted into evidence
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Notice, Hearsay Exceptions, Document Authentication, Undertakings to Officer in Charge, Canada Evidence Act, Criminal Code S.508
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Antonio Ronald Riles
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal (charge Under Criminal Code S.145(5.1)) / Trial — Evidentiary Admissibility Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court can take judicial notice of an Undertaking Given to an Officer in Charge to prove the Undertaking itself
- 2 Whether the Undertaking is a court document absent confirmation under s.508 Criminal Code
- 3 Whether the Undertaking qualifies as a public document exception to the hearsay rule
Ratio Decidendi
The Undertaking to an Officer in Charge was not proven to be a court or public document, the Crown failed to authenticate it or invoke an applicable hearsay exception, and therefore the Court cannot take judicial notice of it; the Undertaking is not admitted into evidence.
Court Disposition
Crown's request denied; Undertaking not admitted into evidence
Orders
- Undertaking to the Officer in Charge is not admitted into evidence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment