Pouget v. Saint Elizabeth Health Care
The Court of Appeal referred the costs of the original motion to the motion judge.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2012 ONCA 571
- Parties
- Appellant: Julie Pouget; Respondent: Saint Elizabeth Health Care; Respondent: Judy Davidson
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal; Referral of Costs to Motion Judge
- Outcome
- Costs of the original motion are referred to the motion judge.
- Legal Topics
- Costs of Motion, Referral to Motion Judge, Costs Endorsement
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julie Pouget
Appellant
Saint Elizabeth Health Care
Respondent
Judy Davidson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal; Referral of Costs to Motion Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the costs of the original motion should be referred to the motion judge
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal referred the costs of the original motion to the motion judge.
Court Disposition
Costs of the original motion are referred to the motion judge.
Orders
- Costs of the original motion are referred to the motion judge.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Pouget v. Saint Elizabeth Health Care Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2012-09-05 Neutral citation 2012 ONCA 571 Docket numbers C53714 Judges Feldman, Kathryn N.; MacPherson, James C.; Sharpe, Robert J. Subject Civil Decision Content COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: Pouget v. Saint Elizabeth Health Care, 2012 ONCA 571 DATE: 20120905 DOCKET: C53714 Feldman, MacPherson and Sharpe JJ.A. BETWEEN Julie Pouget Appellant and Saint Elizabeth Health Care and Judy Davidson Respondents Paul J. Pape, for the appellant Christopher M. Andree, for the respondents On appeal from the judgment of Justice Terrence L.J. Patterson of the Superior Court of Justice, dated April 13, 2011, with reasons reported at 2011 ONSC 1013. COSTS ENDORSEMENT [1] Following the release of the reasons of the court dated June 29, 2012, counsel for the parties requested that the court address the issue of the costs of the original motion by referring that matter to the motion judge. [2] Accordingly, costs of the original motion are referred to the motion judge. “K. Feldman J.A.” “J.C. MacPherson J.A.” “Robert J. Sharpe J.A.”