Halifax Physiotherapy & Work Hardening Centre Ltd. v. Lewin
The motion to strike the defendants' jury election was dismissed because the judge found the case was not so complex as to require judge-alone determination: equitable issues may be placed before a jury in Nova Scotia; the factual issues were extricable from legal issues, the contractual documents were not unduly complex, and the expected trial length and volume of documents did not make a jury trial unworkable. Costs of $1,000 plus disbursements were awarded to the defendants.
- Citation
- 2016 NSSC 186
- Parties
- Plaintiff/applicant: Halifax Physiotherapy & Work Hardening Centre Ltd. (carrying on as CBI Health Centre: Halifax); Defendant/respondent: Todd Lewin; Defendant/respondent: Debra Vieth-Morse; Defendant/respondent: Shaun Sangster; Defendant/respondent: Sarah Bayne; Defendant/respondent: Core Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Centre Inc.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty, Interference With Economic Interests, Conspiracy) / Pre Trial Motion to Strike Jury Election (motion Heard July 14, 2016)
- Outcome
- Application to strike jury election dismissed; jury trial to proceed
- Legal Topics
- Jury Trial Election, Motion to Strike Jury Notice, Fiduciary Duty, Breach of Contract, Interference With Economic Relations, Equitable Remedies, Contractual Interpretation, Mitigation of Damages, Expert Evidence
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Halifax Physiotherapy & Work Hardening Centre Ltd. (carrying on as CBI Health Centre: Halifax)
Plaintiff/applicant
Todd Lewin
Defendant/respondent
Debra Vieth-Morse
Defendant/respondent
Shaun Sangster
Defendant/respondent
Sarah Bayne
Defendant/respondent
Core Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Centre Inc.
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil (breach of Contract, Fiduciary Duty, Interference With Economic Interests, Conspiracy) / Pre Trial Motion to Strike Jury Election (motion Heard July 14, 2016)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether motion to strike jury notice should be granted
- 2 Whether equitable issues and equitable remedies require determination by judge alone
- 3 Whether issues of law and fact (notably contractual interpretation) are so interwoven as to make a jury trial inappropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The motion to strike the defendants' jury election was dismissed because the judge found the case was not so complex as to require judge-alone determination: equitable issues may be placed before a jury in Nova Scotia; the factual issues were extricable from legal issues, the contractual documents were not unduly complex, and the expected trial length and volume of documents did not make a jury trial unworkable. Costs of $1,000 plus disbursements were awarded to the defendants.
Court Disposition
Application to strike jury election dismissed; jury trial to proceed
Orders
- Application to strike the jury notice dismissed
- Costs awarded to Defendants in the amount of $1,000 plus disbursements
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment