R. v. Green
The trial judge misapprehended a material fact (duration of restrictive bail) and, had he known the appellant was subject to an 18‑month house‑arrest‑type bail regime, he would have granted the five months' credit requested; leave to appeal is therefore granted and the sentence reduced by five months.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2017 ONCA 244
- Parties
- Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Justin Green; Respondent Counsel: Her Majesty the Queen (counsel)
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Sentence Granted; Oral Release of Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal sentence granted; sentence reduced by five months.
- Legal Topics
- Credit for Restrictive Bail Conditions, R. V. Downes Application, House Arrest / Strict Bail Conditions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Respondent
Justin Green
Appellant
Her Majesty the Queen (counsel)
Respondent Counsel
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Sentence Granted; Oral Release of Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in failing to grant credit for restrictive bail conditions under R. v. Downes
- 2 Whether a factual misapprehension about the duration of bail affected the sentencing outcome
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge misapprehended a material fact (duration of restrictive bail) and, had he known the appellant was subject to an 18‑month house‑arrest‑type bail regime, he would have granted the five months' credit requested; leave to appeal is therefore granted and the sentence reduced by five months.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal sentence granted; sentence reduced by five months.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted
- Sentence reduced by five months
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. Green Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2017-03-24 Neutral citation 2017 ONCA 244 Docket numbers C61981 Judges Feldman, Kathryn N.; van Rensburg, Katherine; Pardu, Gladys I. Subject Criminal Decision Content COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: R. v. Green, 2017 ONCA 244 DATE: 20170324 DOCKET: C61981 Feldman, van Rensburg and Pardu JJ.A. BETWEEN Her Majesty the Queen Respondent and Justin Green Appellant Lance Beechener, for the appellant Kevin Rawluk, for the respondent Heard and released orally: March 17, 2017 On appeal from the sentence imposed on October 13, 2015 by Justice Edward M. Morgan of the Superior Court of Justice. ENDORSEMENT [1] The appellant seeks leave to appeal his sentence based on the failure of the trial judge to give credit for restrictive bail terms following R. v. Downes (2006), 205 C.C.C. (3d) 488 (Ont. C.A.). [2] The trial judge addressed the issue at paragraphs 25-26 of his reasons. It appears clear that he misapprehended the amount of time that the appellant was out on bail. He referred to 42 days, which was the amount of time the appellant was held in custody before he was first released on bail. However, he was actually out on bail for 18 months. [3] The trial judge rejected the request for credit on the basis that bail conditions which allowed the appellant to be out accompanied by one of his sureties were not that onerous. [4] In our view, this approach by the trial judge was informed by what he misunderstood to be the short duration of the bail term. However, had he understood that the appellant was on a house arrest regime similar to that in Downes for 18 months, he would have given the five months’ credit requested by defence counsel. We note that Crown counsel at trial did not take any position on the defence request for credit for difficult bail conditions. [5] We are also satisfied that, given the way the trial judge addressed the issue, had he understood that the bail was for 18 months under restrictive conditions, he would have considered it appropriate to give credit for the strict bail conditions as part of his consideration of a fit sentence. [6] In the result, leave to appeal sentence is granted and the sentence is reduced by five months. “K. Feldman J.A.” “K. van Rensburg J.A.” “G. Pardu J.A.”