Schmaltz v. Canada (Attorney General)

Schmaltz v. Canada (Attorney General)

The Court concluded the Umpire did not err in exercising his discretion to refuse adjournment or rescheduling and therefore dismissed the application for judicial review.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2003 FCA 175
Parties
Applicant: Justin S. Schmaltz; Respondent: The Attorney General of Canada
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
3 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Judicial Review of Umpire Decision (appeals Dismissed)
Outcome
Application for judicial review dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Adjournment, Procedural Fairness, Penalties for False or Misleading Statements
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Employment Insurance Social Security Procedural Law Judicial Review Adjournment Procedural Fairness Penalties for False or Misleading Statements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Justin S. Schmaltz

Applicant

The Attorney General of Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application for Judicial Review of Umpire Decision (appeals Dismissed)

  1. 1 Whether the Umpire erred in refusing requests to adjourn or reschedule the hearing
  2. 2 Whether the Umpire erred in dismissing appeals regarding penalties for making false and misleading statements on employment insurance claims

Ratio Decidendi

The Court concluded the Umpire did not err in exercising his discretion to refuse adjournment or rescheduling and therefore dismissed the application for judicial review.

Court Disposition

Application for judicial review dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs in the lump sum of $2,000.00 inclusive of disbursements