R. v. Kissack

R. v. Kissack

Because the appellant had been released after serving the sentence, the Court declined to address the merits of the sentencing appeal and dismissed the appeal as there was no practical relief to be granted.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2013 ONCA 345
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Kathleen Kissack
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 May 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Joint Sentencing Submissions, Mootness of Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Joint Sentencing Submissions Mootness of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Kathleen Kissack

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Sentence to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred by imposing a significantly higher sentence after allowing parties to defend a joint submission
  2. 2 Whether the appeal should be decided on the merits where the appellant has been released after serving the sentence

Ratio Decidendi

Because the appellant had been released after serving the sentence, the Court declined to address the merits of the sentencing appeal and dismissed the appeal as there was no practical relief to be granted.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed