R. v. Katalayi-Kassende

R. v. Katalayi-Kassende

The Crown conceded that the SOIRA order was improperly made and the appellant abandoned all other grounds of appeal; therefore the only relief granted was removal of the improperly made SOIRA order while other statutory publication restrictions remain in force.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2019 ONCA 137
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Ken Michel Katalayi-Kassende
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
28 February 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal allowed only to the extent of removing the SOIRA order; all other grounds of appeal abandoned.
Legal Topics
SOIRA Order, Publication Ban, Appeal, Conviction, Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law SOIRA Order Publication Ban Appeal Conviction Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Ken Michel Katalayi-Kassende

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence (court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the SOIRA order was properly made
  2. 2 Whether any other grounds of appeal should succeed given appellant's abandonment

Ratio Decidendi

The Crown conceded that the SOIRA order was improperly made and the appellant abandoned all other grounds of appeal; therefore the only relief granted was removal of the improperly made SOIRA order while other statutory publication restrictions remain in force.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed only to the extent of removing the SOIRA order; all other grounds of appeal abandoned.

Orders

  • SOIRA order removed
  • All other grounds of appeal are abandoned by the appellant