R. v. King

R. v. King

Although the compartment's insertion of cocaine was logistically suspicious, the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that King knew of the cocaine because the compartment was skilfully concealed and undetectable to an untrained driver, no fob or other evidence showed he had access or control, documentary discrepancies were equivocal and hearsay-limited, and alternative non-speculative inferences (other participants or company involvement) remained viable.

Citation
2011 BCSC 1878
Parties
Crown: Regina; Accused: Wayne Gerald King
Court
Supreme Court of British Columbia
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
11 October 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Importation and Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking (controlled Drugs and Substances Act) / Trial Judgment (acquittal)
Outcome
Acquitted on both counts (not guilty)
Legal Topics
Knowledge Element, Circumstantial Evidence, Reasonable Doubt, Hidden Compartment Searches, Admissibility of Documents
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Drug Offences Evidence Knowledge Element Circumstantial Evidence Reasonable Doubt Hidden Compartment Searches Admissibility of Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Wayne Gerald King

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal Importation and Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking (controlled Drugs and Substances Act) / Trial Judgment (acquittal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Crown proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused knew of the presence of cocaine in the hidden compartment
  2. 2 Admissibility and probative use of documents and electronic records seized from the vehicle
  3. 3 Assessment of accused's credibility and weight of his testimony

Ratio Decidendi

Although the compartment's insertion of cocaine was logistically suspicious, the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that King knew of the cocaine because the compartment was skilfully concealed and undetectable to an untrained driver, no fob or other evidence showed he had access or control, documentary discrepancies were equivocal and hearsay-limited, and alternative non-speculative inferences (other participants or company involvement) remained viable.

Court Disposition

Acquitted on both counts (not guilty)

Orders

  • Accused acquitted of importing cocaine contrary to s.6(1) Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and of possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking contrary to s.5(2) Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
  • Ban on disclosure pursuant to s.486.5(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada