Rakuten Kobo Inc. (variation of CT-2014-001) - Scheduling Order and Reasons for Order regarding the reference proceeding
The Tribunal exercised its case management discretion under s.9(2) of the Competition Tribunal Act to issue a scheduling order setting specific deadlines for the Motion to Strike and the Reference, and directed that the Motion to Strike be disposed of in writing while noting that deadlines may be altered depending...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2014 Comp Trib 6
- Parties
- Applicant: Kobo Inc.; Respondent: The Commissioner of Competition; Respondent: Hachette Book Group Canada Ltd.; Respondent: Hachette Book Group, Inc.; Respondent: Hachette Digital, Inc.; Respondent: HarperCollins Canada Limited; Respondent: Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC; Respondent: Simon & Schuster Canada, a division of CBS Canada Holdings Co.
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Rescission or Variation of Consent Agreement or Order (agreements Between Competitors) / Scheduling Order / Case Management for Reference Proceeding and Motion to Strike
- Outcome
- Scheduling order issued setting deadlines for the Motion to Strike and the Reference; Motion to Strike to be disposed of in writing.
- Legal Topics
- Rescission or Variation of Consent Agreement, Reference Proceeding, Stay of Registration, Case Management, Motion to Strike
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kobo Inc.
Applicant
The Commissioner of Competition
Respondent
Hachette Book Group Canada Ltd.
Respondent
Hachette Book Group, Inc.
Respondent
Hachette Digital, Inc.
Respondent
HarperCollins Canada Limited
Respondent
Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC
Respondent
Simon & Schuster Canada, a division of CBS Canada Holdings Co.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rescission or Variation of Consent Agreement or Order (agreements Between Competitors) / Scheduling Order / Case Management for Reference Proceeding and Motion to Strike
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to issue a scheduling order for Kobo's s.106(2) application and related reference proceeding
- 2 Whether the Motion to Strike should be disposed of in writing
- 3 Whether the timetable should account for the stay of registration and potential effects of the Reference and Motion to Strike outcomes
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal exercised its case management discretion under s.9(2) of the Competition Tribunal Act to issue a scheduling order setting specific deadlines for the Motion to Strike and the Reference, and directed that the Motion to Strike be disposed of in writing while noting that deadlines may be altered depending on the outcomes of the Motion to Strike and the Reference.
Court Disposition
Scheduling order issued setting deadlines for the Motion to Strike and the Reference; Motion to Strike to be disposed of in writing.
Orders
- Commissioner to serve and file responding motion materials by Friday, May 9, 2014.
- Cross-examinations, if any, to occur May 9–16, 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Rakuten Kobo Inc. (variation of CT-2014-001) - Scheduling Order and Reasons for Order regarding the reference proceeding Collection Case Documents Date Filed 2014-05-14 Neutral citation 2014 Comp Trib 6 File Number CT-2014-002 Document Type Decisions Type of Application Rescission or Variation of Consent Agreement or Order (Agreements between Competitors) Section(s) of the Competition Act ss. 106 (90.1 and 105) Proceeding Number 61 Decision Content Competition Tribunal Tribunal de la Concurrence Reference: Kobo Inc. v. The Commissioner of Competition, 2014 Comp. Trib. 6 File No.: CT-2014-02 Registry Document No.: 61 IN THE MATTER OF the Competition Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. C 34 as amended; AND IN THE MATTER OF an inquiry commenced under section 10 of the Competition Act, relating to certain alleged anti-competitive conduct in the markets for E-books in Canada; AND IN THE MATTER OF the filing and registration of a consent agreement pursuant to section 105 of the Competition Act; AND IN THE MATTER OF an application under section 106(2) of the Competition Act, by Kobo Inc. to rescind or vary the Consent Agreement between the Commissioner of Competition and Hachette Book Group Canada Ltd., Hachette Book Group, Inc., Hachette Digital, Inc.; HarperCollins Canada Limited; Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC; and Simon & Schuster Canada, a division of CBS Canada Holdings Co. filed and registered with the Competition Tribunal on February 7, 2014, under section 105 of the Competition Act. BETWEEN: Kobo Inc. (applicant) and The Commissioner of Competition, Hachette Book Group Canada Ltd., Hachette Book Group, Inc., Hachette Digital Inc., HarperCollins Canada Limited, Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC; and Simon & Schuster Canada, a division of CBS Canada Holdings Co. (respondents) Decided on the basis of the written record Before Judicial Member: Rennie J. (Chairperson) Date of Order and Reasons: May 14, 2014 Order and Reasons signed by: Mr. Justice Donald J. Rennie SCHEDULING ORDER AND REASONS FOR ORDER REGARDING THE REFERENCE PROCEEDINGS [1] On March 18, 2014 the registration of the consent agreement in issue in this matter was stayed pending determination of Kobo’s application under subsection 106(2) of the Competition Act (RSC, 1985, c C-34). Given the outstanding stay order, at the Case Management Conference of April 16, 2014, the Tribunal suggested a hearing date in the fall of 2014 for the application, and requested the parties provide an agreed upon schedule for the hearing of the application. [2] The Tribunal has considered the draft consent schedule submitted by the parties on April 30, 2014 and correspondence from counsel for the Commissioner of May 12, 2014, in light of subsection 9(2) of the Competition Tribunal Act, RSC 1985, c 19 (2nd Supp.) which provides that all proceedings before the Tribunal shall be dealt with as informally and expeditiously as the circumstances and considerations of fairness permit. While the proposed schedule for hearing of the application cannot be characterized as aggressive, the parties are all represented by experienced counsel who have agreed to the timetable. [3] The Tribunal notes that the nature of 106(2) proceedings will be informed by the outcome of Kobo’s Motion to Strike and the outcome of the Reference, if it proceeds. In consequence of those decisions, the deadlines set out below may be altered. The Tribunal agrees with the joint request of the parties that the Motion to Strike be disposed of in writing. IN THIS CONTEXT, THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS THAT: The Motion to Strike: Friday, May 9, 2014 The Commissioner is to serve and file responding motion materials. May 9 – 16, 2014 Cross-examinations, if any. Friday, May 16, 2014 Kobo is to serve and file its motion record. Friday, May 23, 2014 Commissioner is to serve and file responding motion record. The Reference: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 Kobo is to serve and file a response to the Reference with a responding reference record. Friday, June 20, 2014 The Commissioner is to file his final reference record. Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Hearing of the Reference, commencing at 9:30 a.m. in the hearing room of the Competition Tribunal at 90 Sparks Street, Ottawa, Ontario, for a duration of 1 day. DATED at Ottawa, this 14th day of May, 2014. SIGNED on behalf of the Tribunal by the Chairperson. (s) Donald J. Rennie COUNSEL: For the applicant: Kobo Inc. Nikiforos Iatrou Mandy L. Seidenberg Bronwyn Roe For the respondents: Commissioner of Competition Jonathan Chaplan John Syme Parul Shah Esther Rossman Hachette Book Group Canada Ltd., Hachette Book Group, Inc., Hachette Digital, Inc. James Gotowiec HarperCollins Canada Limited Katherine L. Kay Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC Emrys Davis Simon & Schuster Canada, a division of CBS Canada Holdings Co. Peter Franklyn