R. v. Rana
The application was dismissed because the Court of Appeal panel did not have jurisdiction to review the single-judge decision in the absence of leave under s.680 of the Criminal Code.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2014 ONCA 831
- Parties
- Applicant: Kris Rana; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen in right of Province of Ontario
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (motion to Review Single Judge Decision) / Motion to Review Single Judge Decision; Panel Considered Jurisdiction Under S.680
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because leave under s.680 of the Criminal Code was not obtained.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Driving Prohibition, Jurisdiction Under S.680 of the Criminal Code, Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court, Review of Single Judge Decision
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kris Rana
Applicant
Her Majesty the Queen in right of Province of Ontario
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (motion to Review Single Judge Decision) / Motion to Review Single Judge Decision; Panel Considered Jurisdiction Under S.680
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal panel had jurisdiction to review the single-judge decision without leave under s.680 of the Criminal Code
- 2 Whether a stay of the driving prohibition could be granted pending the applicant's application to the Supreme Court of Canada
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the Court of Appeal panel did not have jurisdiction to review the single-judge decision in the absence of leave under s.680 of the Criminal Code.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because leave under s.680 of the Criminal Code was not obtained.
Orders
- Application to review dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
R. v. Rana Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2014-11-24 Neutral citation 2014 ONCA 831 Docket numbers C58430, M44228 Judges Rouleau, Paul S.; van Rensburg, Katherine; Pardu, Gladys I. Subject Criminal Decision Content COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: R. v. Rana, 2014 ONCA 831 DATE: 20141121 DOCKET: M44228 (C58430) Rouleau, van Rensburg and Pardu JJ.A. BETWEEN Kris Rana Applicant and Her Majesty the Queen in right of Province of Ontario Respondent Kris Rana, acting in person Amanda Rubaszek, for the respondent Heard: November 19, 2014 On a motion to review a single judge decision. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] The appellant seeks to review the decision of Pepall J.A. dismissing her request for a stay of her driving prohibition pending her application to the Supreme Court of Canada. In our view, this panel does not have jurisdiction given that leave has not been obtained under s. 680 of the Code. [2] As a result, this application is dismissed.