Caster (Re)

Caster (Re)

The Court upheld the Board's detention order because the record, including the treating psychiatrist's evidence of the appellant's pattern of non-compliance, unstructured lifestyle, need to abstain from substance use to resolve diagnosis, and need for day-to-day follow-up, supported the Board's conclusion that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2013 ONCA 785
Parties
Appellant: Kyle Caster; Amicus Curiae: Joseph Di Luca; Respondent: Attorney General of Ontario; Intervener: Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
23 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Part Xx.1 of the Criminal Code (appeal From Ontario Review Board) / Appeal From Ontario Review Board Decision Dated May 8, 2013
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; Ontario Review Board detention order upheld
Legal Topics
Review Board Disposition, Detention Order, Least Onerous and Least Restrictive Disposition, Ss. 672.91 672.93 Criminal Code
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Mental Health Law Review Board Disposition Detention Order Least Onerous and Least Restrictive Disposition Ss. 672.91 672.93 Criminal Code

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kyle Caster

Appellant

Joseph Di Luca

Amicus Curiae

Attorney General of Ontario

Respondent

Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Part Xx.1 of the Criminal Code (appeal From Ontario Review Board) / Appeal From Ontario Review Board Decision Dated May 8, 2013

  1. 1 Whether the Ontario Review Board's detention order was the least onerous and least restrictive disposition
  2. 2 Whether the Board misapprehended the operation of ss. 672.91-.93 of the Criminal Code

Ratio Decidendi

The Court upheld the Board's detention order because the record, including the treating psychiatrist's evidence of the appellant's pattern of non-compliance, unstructured lifestyle, need to abstain from substance use to resolve diagnosis, and need for day-to-day follow-up, supported the Board's conclusion that detention was the least onerous and least restrictive disposition.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; Ontario Review Board detention order upheld

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; detention order of the Ontario Review Board dated May 8, 2013 is affirmed