Caster (Re)
The Court upheld the Board's detention order because the record, including the treating psychiatrist's evidence of the appellant's pattern of non-compliance, unstructured lifestyle, need to abstain from substance use to resolve diagnosis, and need for day-to-day follow-up, supported the Board's conclusion that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2013 ONCA 785
- Parties
- Appellant: Kyle Caster; Amicus Curiae: Joseph Di Luca; Respondent: Attorney General of Ontario; Intervener: Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under Part Xx.1 of the Criminal Code (appeal From Ontario Review Board) / Appeal From Ontario Review Board Decision Dated May 8, 2013
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Ontario Review Board detention order upheld
- Legal Topics
- Review Board Disposition, Detention Order, Least Onerous and Least Restrictive Disposition, Ss. 672.91 672.93 Criminal Code
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kyle Caster
Appellant
Joseph Di Luca
Amicus Curiae
Attorney General of Ontario
Respondent
Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Part Xx.1 of the Criminal Code (appeal From Ontario Review Board) / Appeal From Ontario Review Board Decision Dated May 8, 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Ontario Review Board's detention order was the least onerous and least restrictive disposition
- 2 Whether the Board misapprehended the operation of ss. 672.91-.93 of the Criminal Code
Ratio Decidendi
The Court upheld the Board's detention order because the record, including the treating psychiatrist's evidence of the appellant's pattern of non-compliance, unstructured lifestyle, need to abstain from substance use to resolve diagnosis, and need for day-to-day follow-up, supported the Board's conclusion that detention was the least onerous and least restrictive disposition.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Ontario Review Board detention order upheld
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; detention order of the Ontario Review Board dated May 8, 2013 is affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Caster (Re) Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2013-12-23 Neutral citation 2013 ONCA 785 Docket numbers C57103 Judges Hoy, Alexandra; Gillese, Eileen E.; Strathy, George R. Subject Criminal Decision Content COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: Caster (Re), 2013 ONCA 785 DATE: 20131220 DOCKET: C57103 Hoy A.C.J.O., Gillese and Strathy JJ.A. IN THE MATTER OF: KYLE CASTER AN APPEAL UNDER PART XX.1 OF THE CODE Kyle Caster, appearing in person Joseph Di Luca, appearing as amicus Erin Winocur, appearing for the Attorney General E. Krajewska, appearing for the Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences Heard: December 19, 2013 On appeal against the disposition of the Ontario Review Board dated, May 8, 2013. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] We note that the index offence involved violence. In our view, the Board’s decision that a detention order was the least onerous and least restrictive disposition to the accused was reasonable and fully supported by the record. In particular, we note the appellant’s treating psychiatrist’s reference to the appellant’s pattern of non-compliance with court and hospital imposed conditions, his unstructured lifestyle, his need to successfully abstain from substance use to rule out a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, and his need to be followed day after day in his efforts to abstain from substance abuse. In light of our disposition of the appeal, it is unnecessary to decide amicus’ submission that the Board misapprehends the operation of ss. 672.91-.93 of the Criminal Code. In our view, that submission warrants serious consideration in a case where it has first been fully and fairly argued before the Board.