L'Épinglerie Ltée. v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)

L'Épinglerie Ltée. v. Canada (Minister of National Revenue)

The appeal was dismissed because the motions judge properly relied on the affidavit and the respondent's list of documents to conclude that no additional relevant documents existed; the evidence supported that conclusion and no error was shown.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2001 FCA 211
Parties
Appellant: L'ÉPINGLERIE LTÉE; Appellant: ARECO INC; Appellant: PAUL MATTE; Applicant: STÉPHANE MATTE; Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL REVENUE
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
21 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Disclosure, Production of Documents, Affidavit Evidence, Standard of Review
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Tax Law Civil Procedure Evidence Disclosure Production of Documents Affidavit Evidence Standard of Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

L'ÉPINGLERIE LTÉE

Appellant

ARECO INC

Appellant

PAUL MATTE

Appellant

STÉPHANE MATTE

Applicant

DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL REVENUE

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the motions judge erred in finding that the Minister produced all relevant documents
  2. 2 Whether an affidavit establishing non‑existence of additional documents can justify refusal of further production
  3. 3 Whether the evidence supported the motions judge's conclusion

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the motions judge properly relied on the affidavit and the respondent's list of documents to conclude that no additional relevant documents existed; the evidence supported that conclusion and no error was shown.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed, without costs