L-3 Communications Mapps Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General)
The Federal Court of Appeal concluded that it was not persuaded the Tribunal's finding was unreasonable; therefore the Tribunal was correct to find the complaint was filed outside the 10‑day limit and the application was dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2009 FCA 350
- Parties
- Applicant: L-3 COMMUNICATIONS MAPPS INC.; Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 1 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Administrative Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed without costs
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Period, Time Limit for Filing Complaint, Canadian International Trade Tribunal Procurement Inquiry Regulations
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS MAPPS INC.
Applicant
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Administrative Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's complaint was filed within the 10‑day time limit prescribed by section 6(1) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Procurement Inquiry Regulations
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's conclusion on the timing was unreasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The Federal Court of Appeal concluded that it was not persuaded the Tribunal's finding was unreasonable; therefore the Tribunal was correct to find the complaint was filed outside the 10‑day limit and the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed without costs
Orders
- Application dismissed
- No costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
L-3 Communications Mapps Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2009-12-01 Neutral citation 2009 FCA 350 File numbers A-133-09 Decision Content Date: 20091201 Docket: A-133-09 Citation: 2009 FCA 350 CORAM: EVANS J.A. SHARLOW J.A. RYER J.A. BETWEEN: L-3 COMMUNICATIONS MAPPS INC. Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 1, 2009. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 1, 2009. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: SHARLOW J.A. Date: 20091201 Docket: A-133-09 Citation: 2009 FCA 350 CORAM: EVANS J.A. SHARLOW J.A. RYER J.A. BETWEEN: L-3 COMMUNICATIONS MAPPS INC. Applicant and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on December 1, 2009.) [1] Despite the able submissions of counsel for the applicant, we have not been persuaded that it was unreasonable for the Canadian International Trade Tribunal to conclude that the applicant’s complaint was filed outside the 10-day time limit prescribed by section 6(1) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Procurement Inquiry Regulations, SOR/93-602. For that reason this application will be dismissed, in the circumstances without costs. “K. Sharlow” J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-133-09 STYLE OF CAUSE: L-3 COMMUNICATIONS MAPPS INC. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: December 1, 2009 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: Evans, Sharlow and Ryer JJ. A. DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Sharlow J.A. APPEARANCES: Richard A. Wagner G. Ian Clarke FOR THE APPLICANT Michael Ciavaglia David Aaron FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Ogilvy Renault LLP Ottawa, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANT John H. Sims, Q.C. Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT