Lac la Ronge Indian Band v. Laliberte
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to discharge the heavy burden required to show the adjudicator's material findings of fact were irrational or unsupported on any rational view of the evidence in light of the privative clause.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2003 FCA 65
- Parties
- Appellant: Lac La Ronge Indian Band; Respondent: Larry Laliberte; Respondent: Sol Charles; Respondent: Robert Ballantyne
- Court
- Federal Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 5 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Federal Court Judgment on Judicial Review of Labour Adjudicator Decision / Hearing and Judgment at Federal Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unjust Dismissal, Privative Clause, Standard of Review, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lac La Ronge Indian Band
Appellant
Larry Laliberte
Respondent
Sol Charles
Respondent
Robert Ballantyne
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Federal Court Judgment on Judicial Review of Labour Adjudicator Decision / Hearing and Judgment at Federal Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator's factual findings were unreasonable and unsupported on any rational view of the evidence
- 2 Whether the Federal Court should have set aside the adjudicator's decision on judicial review
- 3 Application and effect of a strong privative clause on the standard of review and burden of proof
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to discharge the heavy burden required to show the adjudicator's material findings of fact were irrational or unsupported on any rational view of the evidence in light of the privative clause.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Award costs to respondents in the lump sum of $4,000.00 inclusive of disbursements payable by the appellant with respect to this appeal and A-640-00
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Lac la Ronge Indian Band v. Laliberte Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2003-02-05 Neutral citation 2003 FCA 65 File numbers A-412-00 Decision Content Date: 20030205 Docket: A-412-00 Neutral citation: 2003 FCA 65 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN, J.A. EVANS, J.A. MALONE, J.A. BETWEEN: LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND, Appellant - and - LARRY LALIBERTE, Respondent - and - LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND, Appellant - and - SOL CHARLES, Respondent - and - LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND, Appellant - and - ROBERT BALLANTYNE, Respondent Heard at Edmonton, Alberta, Wednesday, February 5th, 2003. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Edmonton, Alberta, on February 5th , 2003. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: EVANS, J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: ROTHSTEIN, J.A. MALONE, J.A. Date: 20030205 Docket: A-412-00 Neutral citation: 2003 FCA 65 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN, J.A. EVANS, J.A. MALONE, J.A. BETWEEN: LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND, Appellant - and - LARRY LALIBERTE, Respondent - and - LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND, Appellant - and - SOL CHARLES, Respondent - and - LAC LA RONGE INDIAN BAND, Appellant - and - ROBERT BALLANTYNE, Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Edmonton, Alberta, on February 5th, 2003. EVANS, J.A. [1] This is an appeal by the Lac La Ronge Band from a decision of Pelletier J. (as he then was), dated May 15, 2000, in which he dismissed the Band's application for judicial to set aside a decision of an Adjudicator, dated November 4, 1998. The Adjudicator had upheld the respondents' complaints under the Canada Labour Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. L-2, section 240, that they had been unjustly dismissed from their employment by the appellant. Counsel for the appellant did not satisfy us that the decision under appeal contained any error warranting the intervention of this Court. [2] Counsel for the appellant's principal ground of appeal was that the Adjudicator had committed serious errors in her findings of fact, particularly with respect to the motives of the Band in dismissing the respondents. We would only note that, on an application for judicial review of a decision of an administrative tribunal, especially when, as in this case, its decisions are protected by a strong privative clause, an applicant has a very heavy burden to discharge who alleges that the decision should be set aside because it was based on a material finding of fact that cannot be supported on any rational view of the evidence. We are all of the opinion that counsel for the Appellants did not succeed in discharging that burden. [3] For these reasons the appeals will be dismissed with a single award of costs in the lump sum of $4,000.00, inclusive of disbursements, payable by the appellant with respect to this appeal and A-640-00. "John M. Evans" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-412-00 STYLE OF CAUSE: Lac La Ronge Indian Band v. Larry LaLiberte Lac La Ronge Indian Band v. Sol Charles Lac La Ronge Indian Band v. Robert Ballantyne PLACE OF HEARING: Edmonton, Alberta DATE OF HEARING: February 05, 2003 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: EVANS J.A. CONCURRED IN BY: ROTHSTEIN J.A., MALONE J.A. DATED: February 05, 2003 APPEARANCES: Mr. Peter Abrametz FOR THE APPELLANT Mr. Bruce Slusar FOR THE RESPONDENTS SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Eggum, Abrametz & Eggum FOR THE APPELLANT Prince Albert, Saskatchewan Mr. Bruce Slusar FOR THE RESPONDENTS Saskatoon, Saskatchewan