Lac la Ronge Indian Band v. Laliberte

Lac la Ronge Indian Band v. Laliberte

The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to discharge the heavy burden required to show the adjudicator's material findings of fact were irrational or unsupported on any rational view of the evidence in light of the privative clause.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2003 FCA 65
Parties
Appellant: Lac La Ronge Indian Band; Respondent: Larry Laliberte; Respondent: Sol Charles; Respondent: Robert Ballantyne
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
5 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Federal Court Judgment on Judicial Review of Labour Adjudicator Decision / Hearing and Judgment at Federal Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Unjust Dismissal, Privative Clause, Standard of Review, Costs
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Labour Law Judicial Review Unjust Dismissal Privative Clause Standard of Review Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lac La Ronge Indian Band

Appellant

Larry Laliberte

Respondent

Sol Charles

Respondent

Robert Ballantyne

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Federal Court Judgment on Judicial Review of Labour Adjudicator Decision / Hearing and Judgment at Federal Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the adjudicator's factual findings were unreasonable and unsupported on any rational view of the evidence
  2. 2 Whether the Federal Court should have set aside the adjudicator's decision on judicial review
  3. 3 Application and effect of a strong privative clause on the standard of review and burden of proof

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to discharge the heavy burden required to show the adjudicator's material findings of fact were irrational or unsupported on any rational view of the evidence in light of the privative clause.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Award costs to respondents in the lump sum of $4,000.00 inclusive of disbursements payable by the appellant with respect to this appeal and A-640-00