R v. Rhodenizer
The warrant was valid because, viewed as a whole, multiple independent informants and police surveillance provided sufficient reliable information that might reasonably be believed by the Justice of the Peace to constitute reasonable and probable grounds for a drug search; therefore the search complied with Charter s.8 and the exclusion remedy under s.24(2) need not be addressed.
- Citation
- 2003 NSPC 17
- Parties
- Crown: Her Majesty the Queen; Defendant: Lance Boyd Rhodenizer
- Court
- Nova Scotia Provincial Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 8 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application to Exclude Evidence Under S.24(2) Following Review of a Search Warrant Issuance
- Outcome
- Application to exclude evidence dismissed; warrant upheld; search found lawful under Charter s.8.
- Legal Topics
- Search and Seizure, Warrant Issuance, Informant Reliability, Reasonable and Probable Grounds, Charter S.8, Charter S.24(2)
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty the Queen
Crown
Lance Boyd Rhodenizer
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application to Exclude Evidence Under S.24(2) Following Review of a Search Warrant Issuance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the information to obtain the warrant met the Debot test and provided reasonable and probable grounds for issuance
- 2 Whether the search breached Charter s.8 protection against unreasonable search and seizure
- 3 Whether evidence obtained should be excluded under Charter s.24(2)
Ratio Decidendi
The warrant was valid because, viewed as a whole, multiple independent informants and police surveillance provided sufficient reliable information that might reasonably be believed by the Justice of the Peace to constitute reasonable and probable grounds for a drug search; therefore the search complied with Charter s.8 and the exclusion remedy under s.24(2) need not be addressed.
Court Disposition
Application to exclude evidence dismissed; warrant upheld; search found lawful under Charter s.8.
Orders
- Application for exclusion of evidence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment