Randall v. Caldwell First Nation of Point Pelee
The Implied Undertaking applied to the discovery materials in this Federal Court litigation; Chief Johnson breached that undertaking by broadly publicizing and communicating discovery-derived allegations about non-parties to rally support, and was therefore in contempt beyond a reasonable doubt because the Implied Undertaking is a longstanding common law rule presumed known; communications limited to contacting directly affected non-parties to obtain information necessary to defend their membership were permissible; accordingly contempt was found but only declaratory and monetary relief (costs) and an order to publish an explanatory statement and to obey the Implied Undertaking were...
- Citation
- 2002 FCT 31
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Phyllis Randall et al; Louise Hillier et al; Defendants: Caldwell First Nation of Point Pelee and Pelee Island Council et al; Defendant: Larry Johnson (Chief)
- Court
- Federal Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Consolidated Civil Actions With Attendant Contempt Proceeding Arising From Discovery/disclosure Disputes / Reasons for Order Following Contempt Hearing (post Trial Interlocutory Proceeding)
- Outcome
- Chief Johnson found in contempt of the Implied Undertaking (breach of confidentiality of discovery materials) in part; certain communications were held not to breach because they were necessary to defend non-parties' membership
- Legal Topics
- Implied Undertaking, Use of Discovery Materials, Discovery and Examinations for Discovery, Contempt Proceedings, Remedies and Costs
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Phyllis Randall et al; Louise Hillier et al
Plaintiffs
Caldwell First Nation of Point Pelee and Pelee Island Council et al
Defendants
Larry Johnson (Chief)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Consolidated Civil Actions With Attendant Contempt Proceeding Arising From Discovery/disclosure Disputes / Reasons for Order Following Contempt Hearing (post Trial Interlocutory Proceeding)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Implied Undertaking (confidentiality of discovery material) applied to information obtained in examinations for discovery and production of documents
- 2 Whether Chief Johnson breached the Implied Undertaking by notifying and publicizing the names of non-parties whose membership was challenged
- 3 Whether contempt could be established absent actual personal knowledge of a court order and the required mens rea
Ratio Decidendi
The Implied Undertaking applied to the discovery materials in this Federal Court litigation; Chief Johnson breached that undertaking by broadly publicizing and communicating discovery-derived allegations about non-parties to rally support, and was therefore in contempt beyond a reasonable doubt because the Implied Undertaking is a longstanding common law rule presumed known; communications limited to contacting directly affected non-parties to obtain information necessary to defend their membership were permissible; accordingly contempt was found but only declaratory and monetary relief (costs) and an order to publish an explanatory statement and to obey the Implied Undertaking were...
Court Disposition
Chief Johnson found in contempt of the Implied Undertaking (breach of confidentiality of discovery materials) in part; certain communications were held not to breach because they were necessary to defend non-parties' membership
Orders
- Chief Johnson ordered to publish a statement explaining the contempt proceedings and their outcome and to obey the Implied Undertaking until further order of the Court
- Chief Johnson ordered to pay specified costs to the Plaintiffs within 120 days
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment