Randall v. Caldwell First Nation of Point Pelee

Randall v. Caldwell First Nation of Point Pelee

The Implied Undertaking applied to the discovery materials in this Federal Court litigation; Chief Johnson breached that undertaking by broadly publicizing and communicating discovery-derived allegations about non-parties to rally support, and was therefore in contempt beyond a reasonable doubt because the Implied Undertaking is a longstanding common law rule presumed known; communications limited to contacting directly affected non-parties to obtain information necessary to defend their membership were permissible; accordingly contempt was found but only declaratory and monetary relief (costs) and an order to publish an explanatory statement and to obey the Implied Undertaking were...

Citation
2002 FCT 31
Parties
Plaintiffs: Phyllis Randall et al; Louise Hillier et al; Defendants: Caldwell First Nation of Point Pelee and Pelee Island Council et al; Defendant: Larry Johnson (Chief)
Court
Federal Court
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
14 January 2002
Procedural Posture
Consolidated Civil Actions With Attendant Contempt Proceeding Arising From Discovery/disclosure Disputes / Reasons for Order Following Contempt Hearing (post Trial Interlocutory Proceeding)
Outcome
Chief Johnson found in contempt of the Implied Undertaking (breach of confidentiality of discovery materials) in part; certain communications were held not to breach because they were necessary to defend non-parties' membership
Legal Topics
Implied Undertaking, Use of Discovery Materials, Discovery and Examinations for Discovery, Contempt Proceedings, Remedies and Costs
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Phyllis Randall et al; Louise Hillier et al

Plaintiffs

Caldwell First Nation of Point Pelee and Pelee Island Council et al

Defendants

Larry Johnson (Chief)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Consolidated Civil Actions With Attendant Contempt Proceeding Arising From Discovery/disclosure Disputes / Reasons for Order Following Contempt Hearing (post Trial Interlocutory Proceeding)

  1. 1 Whether the Implied Undertaking (confidentiality of discovery material) applied to information obtained in examinations for discovery and production of documents
  2. 2 Whether Chief Johnson breached the Implied Undertaking by notifying and publicizing the names of non-parties whose membership was challenged
  3. 3 Whether contempt could be established absent actual personal knowledge of a court order and the required mens rea

Ratio Decidendi

The Implied Undertaking applied to the discovery materials in this Federal Court litigation; Chief Johnson breached that undertaking by broadly publicizing and communicating discovery-derived allegations about non-parties to rally support, and was therefore in contempt beyond a reasonable doubt because the Implied Undertaking is a longstanding common law rule presumed known; communications limited to contacting directly affected non-parties to obtain information necessary to defend their membership were permissible; accordingly contempt was found but only declaratory and monetary relief (costs) and an order to publish an explanatory statement and to obey the Implied Undertaking were...

Court Disposition

Chief Johnson found in contempt of the Implied Undertaking (breach of confidentiality of discovery materials) in part; certain communications were held not to breach because they were necessary to defend non-parties' membership

Orders

  • Chief Johnson ordered to publish a statement explaining the contempt proceedings and their outcome and to obey the Implied Undertaking until further order of the Court
  • Chief Johnson ordered to pay specified costs to the Plaintiffs within 120 days