L'association des senneurs du golfe Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans)

L'association des senneurs du golfe Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans)

The Court was not persuaded that Nadon J. made any error that would justify appellate intervention and therefore dismissed the appeal with costs.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2001 FCA 276
Parties
Appellant: L'Association des Senneurs du Golfe Inc.; Appellant: La Fédération Régionale Acadienne des Pêcheurs Professionnels Inc. (FRAPP); Appellant: Fernand Friolet; Appellant: Émile Gauvin; Appellant: Roméo Michon; Appellant: Camilien Haché; Appellant: Libert Chiasson; Appellant: Eldège Chiasson; Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada represented by the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans; Respondent: The Deputy Director General, Maritime Region (Gulf Fisheries), Department of Fisheries and Oceans
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
19 September 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division / Decision on Appeal (judgment Delivered From the Bench)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Standard of Review, Judicial Deference, Fisheries Regulation, Judicial Intervention on Appeal
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Fisheries Law Judicial Review Appellate Procedure Standard of Review Judicial Deference Fisheries Regulation Judicial Intervention on Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

L'Association des Senneurs du Golfe Inc.

Appellant

La Fédération Régionale Acadienne des Pêcheurs Professionnels Inc. (FRAPP)

Appellant

Fernand Friolet

Appellant

Émile Gauvin

Appellant

Roméo Michon

Appellant

Camilien Haché

Appellant

Libert Chiasson

Appellant

Eldège Chiasson

Appellant

Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada represented by the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans

Respondent

The Deputy Director General, Maritime Region (Gulf Fisheries), Department of Fisheries and Oceans

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Federal Court of Canada, Trial Division / Decision on Appeal (judgment Delivered From the Bench)

  1. 1 Whether the Trial Division judge (Nadon J.) made an error warranting appellate intervention
  2. 2 Whether appellants were entitled to set aside the decision or relief sought
  3. 3 Application of administrative law standards to decisions made under fisheries regulation

Ratio Decidendi

The Court was not persuaded that Nadon J. made any error that would justify appellate intervention and therefore dismissed the appeal with costs.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.