General Motors Products of Canada v. Kravitz
Manufacturer who sells a new product to a dealer is liable under the Civil Code warranty against latent defects to any subsequent purchaser; no-warranty clauses in dealer contracts and conventional manufacturer warranties cannot exclude or limit that statutory warranty as against a non-professional buyer; the warranty follows the thing to the sub-purchaser and permits direct action for cancellation (reimbursement of the price paid to the dealer subject to return) and damages, and manufacturer is jointly and severally liable with dealer in commercial transactions.
- Citation
- [1979] 1 SCR 790
- Parties
- Appellant (manufacturer): General Motors Products of Canada Limited; Respondent (buyer): Leo Kravitz; Co Defendant (dealer): Plamondon Chevrolet-Oldsmobile Ltée
- Court
- Supreme Court of Canada
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 1979
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada Final Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal for Quebec
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Latent Defects, Legal Warranty (redhibition), No Warranty Clause, Conventional Warranty, Manufacturer Liability, Sub Purchaser Rights, Reimbursement and Damages
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
General Motors Products of Canada Limited
Appellant (manufacturer)
Leo Kravitz
Respondent (buyer)
Plamondon Chevrolet-Oldsmobile Ltée
Co Defendant (dealer)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Supreme Court of Canada Final Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal for Quebec
Legal Issues
- 1 Is a manufacturer liable to a subsequent buyer for latent defects in a new vehicle sold through an authorized dealer?
- 2 Can a no-warranty clause in the dealer's contract with the buyer exclude the statutory warranty of the manufacturer or dealer?
- 3 Can a manufacturer's conventional warranty limit or exclude statutory warranty obligations?
Ratio Decidendi
Manufacturer who sells a new product to a dealer is liable under the Civil Code warranty against latent defects to any subsequent purchaser; no-warranty clauses in dealer contracts and conventional manufacturer warranties cannot exclude or limit that statutory warranty as against a non-professional buyer; the warranty follows the thing to the sub-purchaser and permits direct action for cancellation (reimbursement of the price paid to the dealer subject to return) and damages, and manufacturer is jointly and severally liable with dealer in commercial transactions.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Judgments below affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment