Sheldon Nathanson, Barristers & Solicitors Incorporated v. Thomas
The adjudicator found the claimant had made all reasonable efforts to effect personal service as evidenced by the affidavit of attempted service and that alternative residents contacted were not appropriate recipients; accordingly, substituted service was granted with specified alternative methods and conditions, including evidence of continued employment if serving an employer representative.
- Citation
- 2017 NSSM 83
- Parties
- Claimant: Sheldon Nathanson, Barristers & Solicitors Incorporated; Defendant: Laura Lee Thomas
- Court
- Nova Scotia Small Claims Court
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claims Court / Decision on Application for Substituted Service
- Outcome
- Order for substituted service granted
- Legal Topics
- Substituted Service, Personal Service, Affidavit of Attempted Service, Service of Notice
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sheldon Nathanson, Barristers & Solicitors Incorporated
Claimant
Laura Lee Thomas
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Small Claims Court / Decision on Application for Substituted Service
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether substituted service should be permitted under the Small Claims Court Act and Regulations
- 2 Whether the claimant made every reasonable effort to effect personal service
- 3 What alternative methods of substituted service are appropriate in the circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator found the claimant had made all reasonable efforts to effect personal service as evidenced by the affidavit of attempted service and that alternative residents contacted were not appropriate recipients; accordingly, substituted service was granted with specified alternative methods and conditions, including evidence of continued employment if serving an employer representative.
Court Disposition
Order for substituted service granted
Orders
- Substituted service is granted in accordance with the terms of the Order issued by the adjudicator.
- Claimant must effect substituted service by at least one of the alternative means specified in the Order and, if serving a representative of the defendant’s employer, must provide reasonable evidence that the defendant remains employed there.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment