Hassan v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Because both parties consented to dismissal and the court reviewed the materials, the Court dismissed the appeal without costs.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 2024 ONCA 809
- Parties
- Appellant: Layla Hassan; Respondent: Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal to Court of Appeal; Oral Reasons; Dismissal by Consent
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Dismissal, Consent Order, Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Layla Hassan
Appellant
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal to Court of Appeal; Oral Reasons; Dismissal by Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be allowed or dismissed
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded
Ratio Decidendi
Because both parties consented to dismissal and the court reviewed the materials, the Court dismissed the appeal without costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed without costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Hassan v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2024-10-31 Neutral citation 2024 ONCA 809 Docket numbers COA-24-CV-0103 Judges Rouleau, Paul S.; Roberts, Lois B.; Favreau, Lise G. Subject Civil Decision Content COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: Hassan v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, 2024 ONCA 809 DATE: 20241031 DOCKET: COA-24-CV-0103 Rouleau, Roberts and Favreau JJ.A. BETWEEN Layla Hassan Plaintiff (Appellant) and Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada Defendant (Respondent) Martin P. Forget and Maryam Aziz, for the appellant Linda M. Plumpton and J. Toshach Weyman, for the respondent Heard and released orally: October 29, 2024 On appeal from the judgment of Justice Spencer Nicholson of the Superior Court of Justice, dated December 29, 2023. REASONS FOR DECISION [1] In light of the consent of the parties, and upon review of the materials the appeal is dismissed without costs. “Paul Rouleau J.A.” “L.B. Roberts J.A.” “L. Favreau J.A.”