Waldman v. Minister of Justice
The Minister carefully considered the matters raised and his reasons sufficiently justify the refusal on any test for reconsideration; accordingly the appeal is dismissed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- C39760
- Parties
- Applicant: Leib Waldman; Respondent: Minister of Justice
- Court
- Court of Appeal for Ontario
- Jurisdiction
- Canada
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Minister's refusal to reconsider upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Reconsideration, Ministerial Discretion, Standard of Review
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Leib Waldman
Applicant
Minister of Justice
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister properly considered the request for reconsideration
- 2 Whether the Minister's reasons justified refusal under any test for reconsideration
Ratio Decidendi
The Minister carefully considered the matters raised and his reasons sufficiently justify the refusal on any test for reconsideration; accordingly the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Minister's refusal to reconsider upheld.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Waldman v. Minister of Justice Collection Decisions of the Court of Appeal Date 2003-10-30 Docket numbers C39760 Judges O’Connor, Dennis; Moldaver, Michael James; Gillese, Eileen E. Subject Civil Decision Content DATE: 20031030 DOCKET: C39760 COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO RE: LEIB WALDMAN (Applicant) v. MINISTER OF JUSTICE (Respondent) BEFORE: O'CONNOR A.C.J.O., MOLDAVER and GILLESE JJ.A. COUNSEL: Alan D. Gold and Lorne Waldman for the appellant Bradley Reitz for the respondent HEARD & ENDORSED: October 28, 2003 On application for judicial review of the decision of the Minister of Justice of Canada released March 25, 2003. APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT [1] The Minister carefully considered the matters raised in support of the request for reconsideration. On any test for reconsideration, his reasons amply justify the refusal. The appeal is dismissed.