R. v. McKay

R. v. McKay

The trial judge properly instructed himself on the law and his findings of fact were supported by the evidence; therefore the convictions for dangerous driving were reasonable and the appeal must be dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
C38770
Parties
Respondent: Her Majesty the Queen; Appellant: Leo McKay
Court
Court of Appeal for Ontario
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
22 July 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Dangerous Driving, Conviction, Appeal, Standard of Review
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Dangerous Driving Conviction Appeal Standard of Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

Leo McKay

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Appeal From Conviction and Sentence (court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in law or made findings of fact unsupported by the evidence when convicting the appellant of dangerous driving
  2. 2 Whether the convictions for dangerous driving were unreasonable

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge properly instructed himself on the law and his findings of fact were supported by the evidence; therefore the convictions for dangerous driving were reasonable and the appeal must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Convictions for dangerous driving and the sentence imposed are affirmed