1162209036 QUEBEC INC (Les Amis de la Rivière Kipawa) v. Canada (Attorney General)

1162209036 QUEBEC INC (Les Amis de la Rivière Kipawa) v. Canada (Attorney General)

The appeal is dismissed because the environmental assessment did consider navigation and the appellant's interests and recommended mitigating measures adequate to preserve, as far as possible, reasonable use of the river, providing no basis for overturning the decision.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2008 FCA 267
Parties
Appellant: LES AMIS DE LA RIVIÈRE KIPAWA (1162209036 QUEBEC INC.); Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA; Respondent: MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES CANADA; Respondent: MINISTER OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS; Respondent: MINISTER OF TRANSPORT; Respondent: DAVID S. LAFLAMME CONSTRUCTION INC.
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
16 September 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal (federal Court of Appeal) / Judgment Delivered on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Environmental Assessment Adequacy, Mitigation Measures, Navigation Impacts, Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Environmental Law Navigation Law Environmental Assessment Adequacy Mitigation Measures Navigation Impacts Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LES AMIS DE LA RIVIÈRE KIPAWA (1162209036 QUEBEC INC.)

Appellant

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

Respondent

MINISTER OF PUBLIC WORKS AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES CANADA

Respondent

MINISTER OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS

Respondent

MINISTER OF TRANSPORT

Respondent

DAVID S. LAFLAMME CONSTRUCTION INC.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (federal Court of Appeal) / Judgment Delivered on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the environmental assessment ignored the question of navigation on the Kipawa River and through the dam
  2. 2 Whether the environmental assessment adequately considered the appellant's interests
  3. 3 Whether recommended mitigation measures were sufficient to preserve reasonable use of the river

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed because the environmental assessment did consider navigation and the appellant's interests and recommended mitigating measures adequate to preserve, as far as possible, reasonable use of the river, providing no basis for overturning the decision.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs