Industries Vogue Ltée v. Canada

Industries Vogue Ltée v. Canada

Costs and disbursements proven by affidavit were allowed; transcripts of testimony from the Canadian International Trade Tribunal were disallowed as they related to another tribunal; item 26 was limited to two units because the assessment was uncontested; respondent awarded $14,781.56 (Federal Court) and $2,181.74...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2005 FCA 43
Parties
Appellant: LES INDUSTRIES VOGUE LTÉE; Respondent: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
31 January 2005
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment Following Federal Court Judgment and Federal Court of Appeal Appeal / Assessment of Costs in Writing After Judgment and Dismissal of Appeal
Outcome
Respondent awarded costs
Legal Topics
Costs Assessment, Disbursements, Transcripts From Other Tribunals, Certificates of Assessment
Source Language
en
Costs Civil Procedure Appellate Procedure Costs Assessment Disbursements Transcripts From Other Tribunals Certificates of Assessment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

LES INDUSTRIES VOGUE LTÉE

Appellant

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Costs Assessment Following Federal Court Judgment and Federal Court of Appeal Appeal / Assessment of Costs in Writing After Judgment and Dismissal of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether respondent entitled to recovery of fees and disbursements in the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal
  2. 2 Proper allowance or disallowance of specific disbursements (transcripts from another tribunal)
  3. 3 Proper unit allowance for item 26 when assessment is uncontested

Ratio Decidendi

Costs and disbursements proven by affidavit were allowed; transcripts of testimony from the Canadian International Trade Tribunal were disallowed as they related to another tribunal; item 26 was limited to two units because the assessment was uncontested; respondent awarded $14,781.56 (Federal Court) and $2,181.74 (Federal Court of Appeal).

Court Disposition

Respondent awarded costs

Orders

  • Federal Court costs assessed and allowed in the amount of $14,781.56; a certificate of assessment will be issued in the Federal Court.
  • Federal Court of Appeal costs assessed and allowed in the amount of $2,181.74; a certificate of assessment will be issued in the Federal Court of Appeal.