Propriétés Belcourt Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue)

Propriétés Belcourt Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue)

The Federal Court of Appeal held the Tax Court judge made no reviewable error in finding the interveners were employed in insurable employment and therefore dismissed the appeals, confirming the Minister's determinations.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2009 FCA 334
Parties
Appellant: Les Propriétés Belcourt Inc.; Respondent: Minister of National Revenue; Intervener: Lina Vaccaro; Intervener: Donald Taillefer; Intervener: Sukhy Basra; Intervener: Marc G. Ranger; Intervener: Louise Dineen Labrecque; Intervener: William Bumbray; Intervener: Robert Baillargeon
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
18 November 2009
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Subsection 103(1) of the Employment Insurance Act / Federal Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From the Tax Court of Canada
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Insurable Employment, Employment Status Determination, Standard of Review, Common Evidence
Source Language
en
Employment Insurance Administrative Law Tax Court Procedure Insurable Employment Employment Status Determination Standard of Review Common Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Les Propriétés Belcourt Inc.

Appellant

Minister of National Revenue

Respondent

Lina Vaccaro

Intervener

Donald Taillefer

Intervener

Sukhy Basra

Intervener

Marc G. Ranger

Intervener

Louise Dineen Labrecque

Intervener

William Bumbray

Intervener

Robert Baillargeon

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Subsection 103(1) of the Employment Insurance Act / Federal Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From the Tax Court of Canada

  1. 1 Whether the interveners were employees in insurable employment for the purposes of the Employment Insurance Act
  2. 2 Whether the Tax Court of Canada judge committed a reviewable error of law or palpable and overriding error of fact in confirming the Minister's determinations
  3. 3 Whether the Federal Court of Appeal should intervene and set aside the Tax Court decision

Ratio Decidendi

The Federal Court of Appeal held the Tax Court judge made no reviewable error in finding the interveners were employed in insurable employment and therefore dismissed the appeals, confirming the Minister's determinations.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Appeals dismissed
  • One set of costs awarded to the respondent in this Court and in the Tax Court of Canada