Systèmes Equinox Inc. v. Canada (Public Works and Government Services)

Systèmes Equinox Inc. v. Canada (Public Works and Government Services)

The application was dismissed because the Tribunal's interpretation of the mandatory requirements of the Request for Proposal was based on an acceptable methodology that was not inconsistent with Article 506(6) of the Agreement on Internal Trade, making the Tribunal's finding of non‑compliance not unreasonable.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
2009 FCA 305
Parties
Applicant: Les Systèmes Equinox Inc.; Respondent: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; Respondent: Attorney General of Canada
Court
Federal Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
21 October 2009
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal Federal Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Bid Compliance, Judicial Review Standard of Reasonableness, Interpretation of Mandatory Requirements, Agreement on Internal Trade Article 506(6)
Source Language
en
Administrative Law Procurement Law International Trade Bid Compliance Judicial Review Standard of Reasonableness Interpretation of Mandatory Requirements Agreement on Internal Trade Article 506(6)

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Les Systèmes Equinox Inc.

Applicant

Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada

Respondent

Attorney General of Canada

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Appeal Federal Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Canadian International Trade Tribunal's finding that Equinox's bid was non-compliant was unreasonable
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal's interpretation of the mandatory requirements of the Request for Proposal was consistent with Article 506(6) of the Agreement on Internal Trade

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the Tribunal's interpretation of the mandatory requirements of the Request for Proposal was based on an acceptable methodology that was not inconsistent with Article 506(6) of the Agreement on Internal Trade, making the Tribunal's finding of non‑compliance not unreasonable.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Judicial review application dismissed
  • Decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal dated March 12, 2009 is upheld