Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Babudro / Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Sdraulig

Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Babudro / Canadian Pacific Railway Company v. Sdraulig

Majority (Martland, Judson, Ritchie JJ.): The trial judge did not err in removing the question of liability from the jury; there was no proven breach of statutory/regulatory obligations or negligence by the train crew, and the presence of standing box cars on storage tracks did not amount to exceptional...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1969] SCR 698
Parties
Defendant/appellant: Canadian Pacific Railway Company; Plaintiff/respondent: Angelo Babudro (Administrator of the Estate of Ferruccio Babudro); Plaintiff/respondent: Livia Sdraulig (Administratrix of the Estate of Dante Anthony Sdraulig)
Court
Supreme Court of Canada
Jurisdiction
Canada
Judgment Date
6 June 1969
Procedural Posture
Fatal Accidents — Negligence at Railway Level Crossing / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario Following Trial Where Judge Removed Liability From Jury and Assessed Damages Before Dismissing Actions
Outcome
Appeals allowed; judgments at trial restored (majority). Court of Appeal judgment ordering new trials set aside. Costs awarded to appellant.
Legal Topics
Level Crossing Collisions, Jury Discharge/trial Judge Discretion, Doctrine of Exceptional/special Circumstances, Contributory Negligence and Apportionment, Statutory/regulatory Compliance (operating Rules)
Source Language
english
Torts Negligence Civil Procedure Railway Regulatory Law Level Crossing Collisions Jury Discharge/trial Judge Discretion Doctrine of Exceptional/special Circumstances Contributory Negligence and Apportionment +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Canadian Pacific Railway Company

Defendant/appellant

Angelo Babudro (Administrator of the Estate of Ferruccio Babudro)

Plaintiff/respondent

Livia Sdraulig (Administratrix of the Estate of Dante Anthony Sdraulig)

Plaintiff/respondent

Procedural Posture

Fatal Accidents — Negligence at Railway Level Crossing / Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada From the Court of Appeal for Ontario Following Trial Where Judge Removed Liability From Jury and Assessed Damages Before Dismissing Actions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether trial judge properly exercised discretion to remove question of liability from the jury
  2. 2 Whether Canadian Pacific Railway was negligent in leaving standing box cars that obstructed motorists’ view at the crossing
  3. 3 Whether Uniform Code of Operating Rules (rule 103) or Railway Act/Board orders were breached

Ratio Decidendi

Majority (Martland, Judson, Ritchie JJ.): The trial judge did not err in removing the question of liability from the jury; there was no proven breach of statutory/regulatory obligations or negligence by the train crew, and the presence of standing box cars on storage tracks did not amount to exceptional circumstances imposing additional duties on the railway. Consequently the Court of Appeal’s order for a new trial was set aside and trial judgments restored. Dissent (Cartwright C.J., Spence J.) would have found railway negligence under exceptional circumstances and apportioned liability 75% railway/25% driver, with recovery limited by The Negligence Act for a gratuitous passenger.

Court Disposition

Appeals allowed; judgments at trial restored (majority). Court of Appeal judgment ordering new trials set aside. Costs awarded to appellant.

Orders

  • Appeals allowed
  • Judgments at trial restored (Court of Appeal order for new trial set aside)